Trifluoroacetic Acid

Trifluoroacetic Acid

SCHEMBL6433378

Cc1ccccc1N(CC(=O)O)Cc1ccc2c(N(Cl)C(=N)N)cncc2c1.O=C(O)C(F)(F)F

nearest known ligand 0.33

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
F2 P00734 1/20 0.33
PRSS1 P07477 1/20 0.33
PRSS2 P07478 1/20 0.33
PRSS3 P35030 1/20 0.33
C1S P09871 1/20 0.32
SLC22A12 Q96S37 1/20 0.31
SLC6A2 P23975 1/20 0.31
SLC6A4 P31645 1/20 0.31
SLC6A3 Q01959 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7378316 0.85 GRM2 (0.30)
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6432836 0.79 PLAU (0.39)
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6435141 0.77 PLAU (0.49)
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL7444932 0.76 F2 (0.41) F2PRSS1PRSS2PRSS3
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6432736 0.75 PLAU (0.46)
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6433676 0.75 PLAU (0.48)
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6434437 0.74 PLAU (0.46)
SCHEMBL6434089 0.73 NR1D1 (0.36) SLC6A4
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL6437830 0.72 KEAP1 (0.42)
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL7372144 0.72 CA1 (0.36) F2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 F2 350/4885PRSS1 134/4885PRSS2 202/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 F2 350/4885PRSS1 134/4885PRSS2 202/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.