SCHEMBL6434089

SCHEMBL6434089

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)CN(Cc1ccccc1)Cc1ccc2c(N(Cl)C(=N)N)cncc2c1

nearest known ligand 0.36

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NR1D1 P20393 5/20 0.36
NR1H3 Q13133 1/20 0.36
AKT1 P31749 2/20 0.33
PPARG P37231 4/20 0.32
PPARA Q07869 4/20 0.32
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.32
GSTO1 P78417 1/20 0.32
GRM2 Q14416 1/20 0.31
GRIN2D O15399 1/20 0.31
GRIN3B O60391 1/20 0.31
GRIN1 Q05586 1/20 0.31
GRIN2A Q12879 1/20 0.31
GRIN2B Q13224 1/20 0.31
GRIN2C Q14957 1/20 0.31
GRIN3A Q8TCU5 1/20 0.31
HTR2C P28335 1/20 0.31
SLC6A4 P31645 1/20 0.31
ABCB1 P08183 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7378316 0.85 GRM2 (0.30) GRM2
SCHEMBL7049621 0.84 PLAU (0.42) NR1D1
SCHEMBL7368535 0.81 NR1D1 (0.35) NR1D1NR1H3AKT1PPARGPPARA
SCHEMBL7375959 0.80 F2 (0.37) GSTO1
SCHEMBL7048342 0.79 PLAU (0.41) NR1D1L3MBTL1GSTO1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7371405 0.78 PLAU (0.38) NR1D1
SCHEMBL6434466 0.78 NR1D1 (0.35) NR1D1
SCHEMBL7377975 0.77 PLAU (0.36) NR1D1
SCHEMBL7367639 0.77 ALDH1A1 (0.42)
SCHEMBL7378340 0.77 PDE4A (0.42) NR1D1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 NR1D1 3397/4885NR1H3 3962/4885AKT1 3207/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 NR1D1 3397/4885NR1H3 3962/4885AKT1 3207/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.