SCHEMBL6697638

SCHEMBL6697638

O=Cc1nccc2sncc12

nearest known ligand 0.33

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CCR1 P32246 1/20 0.33
CCR5 P51681 1/20 0.33
CCR8 P51685 1/20 0.33
DRD1 P21728 1/20 0.32
CYP2A6 P11509 1/20 0.32
HTR6 P50406 1/20 0.30
TRPM5 Q9NZQ8 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL17204902 0.75 TRPM5 (0.38) DRD1TRPM5
SCHEMBL627653 0.71 NOS3 (0.41) DRD1TRPM5
SCHEMBL19153002 0.71 CYP2A6 (0.41) CCR1CCR5CCR8DRD1CYP2A6
SCHEMBL28086993 0.68 CYP2A6 (0.40) CCR1CCR5CCR8CYP2A6
SCHEMBL4009278 0.68 HTR6 (0.40) DRD1HTR6TRPM5
SCHEMBL17340999 0.67 DRD1 (0.34) DRD1TRPM5
SCHEMBL18238074 0.67 DRD1 (0.32) DRD1HTR6TRPM5
SCHEMBL2008313 0.65 CYP2A6 (0.41) CCR1CCR5CCR8CYP2A6
SCHEMBL2013046 0.64 ERN1 (0.50) CCR1CCR5CCR8CYP2A6
SCHEMBL29954559 0.64 CCR1 (0.34) CCR1CCR5CCR8

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20040138284-A1 Indol-3-yl derivatives WIESNER MATTHIAS 2004-07-15 US disclosed
US-6743810-B2 INTEGRIN INHIBITORS; TUMORS, OSTEOPOROSIS, OSTEOLYTIC DISEASES, SUPPRESSING ANGIOGENESIS, ANTITHROMBOTIC MERCK PATENT GMBH (DE) 2004-06-01 US disclosed
US-20030045728-A1 Liberating 3-substituted indole compound from one of its functional derivatives by treatment with a solvolyzing or hydrogenating agent, amidation, saponification, alkylation or acylation, or salt formation MERCK PATENT GMBH (DE) 2003-03-06 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030045728-A1 Liberating 3-substituted indole compound from one of its functional derivatives by treatment with a solvolyzing or hydrogenating agent, amidation, saponification, alkylation or acylation, or salt formation IGF1R, IDO1, ITGB3 CCR1 1436/4885CCR5 469/4885CCR8 3433/4885
US-20040138284-A1 Indol-3-yl derivatives ITGB3, ITGB1, IGF1R CCR1 351/4885CCR5 92/4885CCR8 1545/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.