SCHEMBL6724427

SCHEMBL6724427

COc1ccc(NC(=O)N2CCC(c3ccc(O)cc3)CC2)cc1C1CCN(C(C)C)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.47

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.47
▸ NAMPT P43490 2/20 0.45
▸ SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.44
▸ PDE4B Q07343 1/20 0.44
▸ TP53 P04637 2/20 0.43
▸ MAPT P10636 2/20 0.43
▸ MCHR1 Q99705 1/20 0.42
▸ NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.42
▸ QDPR P09417 1/20 0.42
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6724430 0.85 SMN1; SMN2 (0.51) L3MBTL1NAMPTSMN1; SMN2PDE4BMCHR1
SCHEMBL6220946 0.83 MEN1 (0.47) L3MBTL1NAMPTSMN1; SMN2TP53MAPT
SCHEMBL6724719 0.82 HTR1A (0.52) L3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL6718478 0.82 MAPT (0.55) L3MBTL1NAMPTSMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL6222169 0.82 NAMPT (0.48) L3MBTL1NAMPTPDE4B
SCHEMBL6718825 0.81 HTR1A (0.47) L3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2MAPT
SCHEMBL6717719 0.81 HTR1A (0.52) L3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2TP53MAPT
SCHEMBL6824469 0.81 MCHR1 (0.60) MCHR1
SCHEMBL6714770 0.80 HTR1A (0.56) L3MBTL1SMN1; SMN2MAPTNPC1LMNA
SCHEMBL6714737 0.80 HTR1A (0.61) SMN1; SMN2MAPTLMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1313477-A4 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP (US) 2004-03-03 — — EP claimed
US-20040038982-A1 Compounds and methods SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2004-02-26 — — US claimed
EP-1313477-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SmithKline Beecham Corporation (US) 2003-05-28 — — EP claimed
WO-2002005819-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2002-01-24 — — WO claimed
EP-1313477-A4 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORP (US) 2004-03-03 — — EP disclosed
US-20040038982-A1 Compounds and methods SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2004-02-26 — — US disclosed
EP-1313477-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SmithKline Beecham Corporation (US) 2003-05-28 — — EP disclosed
WO-2002005819-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2002-01-24 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040038982-A1 Compounds and methods CCR5, CXCR3, CCR2 L3MBTL1 2959/4885NAMPT 2321/4885SMN1; SMN2 3508/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback