SCHEMBL686554

SCHEMBL686554

O=C(N/N=C/c1cc(C(F)(F)F)ccc1O)c1cccc(Cl)c1

nearest known ligand 0.69

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM1A O60341 2/20 0.69
KMT2A Q03164 8/20 0.68
KDM4E B2RXH2 5/20 0.68
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.68
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 4/20 0.68
HTT P42858 3/20 0.68
POLB P06746 2/20 0.68
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.68
PTBP1 P26599 2/20 0.68
MEN1 O00255 7/20 0.58
RAB9A P51151 5/20 0.58
NPC1 O15118 5/20 0.58
PSMD14 O00487 1/20 0.58
MMP2 P08253 1/20 0.58
BLM P54132 1/20 0.58
MITF O75030 1/20 0.58
GPR174 Q9BXC1 1/20 0.58
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.58
PHGDH O43175 1/20 0.57
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.57

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6569011 0.91 KMT2A (0.75) KDM1AKMT2AKDM4ELMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6569004 0.91 KMT2A (0.75) KDM1AKMT2AKDM4ELMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL686354 0.88 KDM1A (0.69) KDM1AKMT2AKDM4ELMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL686258 0.88 LMNA (0.73) KDM1AKMT2AKDM4ELMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL685734 0.87 KMT2A (0.69) KDM1AKMT2AKDM4ELMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6751419 0.87 KDM1A (0.81) KDM1AKMT2AKDM4ELMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL684639 0.87 KDM1A (0.81) KDM1AKMT2AKDM4ELMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL6751416 0.87 KDM1A (0.81) KDM1AKMT2AKDM4ELMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL20587749 0.86 KMT2A (0.68) KDM1AKMT2AKDM4ELMNASMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL22179548 0.86 KMT2A (0.68) KDM1AKMT2AKDM4ELMNASMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120148682-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-06-14 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, SOD3 KDM1A 484/4885KMT2A 1362/4885KDM4E 1473/4885
US-20120148682-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, CYP4Z1 KDM1A 291/4885KMT2A 1224/4885KDM4E 1286/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.