SCHEMBL7030757

SCHEMBL7030757

Cc1ccccc1NC(=O)c1ccc(/C=C/C(=O)c2ccc(Cl)c(Cl)c2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.55
TAS1R3 Q7RTX0 1/20 0.53
TAS1R1 Q7RTX1 1/20 0.53
TAS1R2 Q8TE23 1/20 0.53
POLB P06746 2/20 0.51
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.51
CXCL12 P48061 1/20 0.49
MMP1 P03956 3/20 0.49
MMP2 P08253 3/20 0.49
MMP9 P14780 3/20 0.49
EGFR P00533 1/20 0.49
PTGS2 P35354 3/20 0.48
MET P08581 2/20 0.48
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.48
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.48
APP P05067 3/20 0.47
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.47
THRB P10828 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7030759 1.00 LMNA (0.55) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2POLB
SCHEMBL8914972 0.84 LMNA (0.69) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2POLB
SCHEMBL11653548 0.82 MMP1 (0.51) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2POLB
SCHEMBL4259537 0.79 PTGS2 (0.53) PTGS2
SCHEMBL4259539 0.79 PTGS2 (0.53) PTGS2
SCHEMBL7035753 0.79 LMNA (0.52) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2POLB
SCHEMBL7035752 0.79 LMNA (0.52) LMNATAS1R3TAS1R1TAS1R2POLB
SCHEMBL9337927 0.78 MAPT (0.70) LMNAPOLBHPGDCXCL12PTGS2
SCHEMBL11578509 0.78 CYP1B1 (0.68) LMNACXCL12PTGS2NPC1RAB9A
SCHEMBL11580338 0.78 CYP1B1 (0.68) LMNACXCL12PTGS2NPC1RAB9A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20030225302-A1 Aromatic amides, their preparation process and their use as pesticides HOECHST SCHERING AGREVO S.A. (FR) 2003-12-04 US disclosed
US-20020068838-A1 AROMATIC AMIDES, THEIR PREPARATION PROCESS AND THEIR USE AS PESTICIDES HOECHST SCHERING AGREVO S.A. (FR) 2002-06-06 US disclosed
EP-1003714-A1 AROMATIC AMIDES, THEIR PREPARATION PROCESS AND THEIR USE AS PESTICIDES Hoechst Schering AgrEvo S.A. (FR) 2000-05-31 EP disclosed
WO-1999001422-A1 AROMATIC AMIDES, THEIR PREPARATION PROCESS AND THEIR USE AS PESTICIDES HOECHST SCHERING AGREVO S.A. (FR) 1999-01-14 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020068838-A1 AROMATIC AMIDES, THEIR PREPARATION PROCESS AND THEIR USE AS PESTICIDES CBR1, CBR3, CYP2E1 LMNA 1663/4885TAS1R3 2807/4885TAS1R1 2496/4885
US-20030225302-A1 Aromatic amides, their preparation process and their use as pesticides CBR3, CBR1, CYP2E1 LMNA 1581/4885TAS1R3 1558/4885TAS1R1 1430/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.