SCHEMBL7043349

SCHEMBL7043349

CCCCCCCCCCc1cnc2c(O)cccc2c1

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
KDM4E B2RXH2 9/20 0.53
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.45
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.45
STAT3 P40763 1/20 0.45
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.45
ATM Q13315 1/20 0.45
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.45
TRPV1 Q8NER1 1/20 0.45
PARP1 P09874 1/20 0.44
ESR1 P03372 2/20 0.42
ADRA2A P08913 2/20 0.42
ADORA3 P0DMS8 2/20 0.42
TACR2 P21452 2/20 0.42
SLC6A2 P23975 2/20 0.42
SLC6A4 P31645 2/20 0.42
SLC6A3 Q01959 2/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.42
SHBG P04278 1/20 0.42
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL31026590 0.83 MAPT (0.45) KDM4ENPC1MAPTSTAT3RAB9A
SCHEMBL31026575 0.83 MAPT (0.45) KDM4ENPC1MAPTSTAT3RAB9A
SCHEMBL31026577 0.83 MAPT (0.45) KDM4ENPC1MAPTSTAT3RAB9A
SCHEMBL4463430 0.82 KDM4E (0.62) KDM4EPARP1CHRM1ACHE
SCHEMBL15886704 0.81 L3MBTL1 (0.44) KDM4ENPC1MAPTSTAT3RAB9A
SCHEMBL345367 0.81 PARP1 (0.55) KDM4ENPC1MAPTRAB9ASMN1; SMN2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL9814936 0.80 KDM4E (0.60) KDM4EPARP1CHRM1ACHE
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL9814926 0.80 KDM4E (0.60) KDM4EPARP1CHRM1ACHE
SCHEMBL11686678 0.80 TRPV1 (0.59) KDM4ENPC1RAB9ATRPV1PTGS2
SCHEMBL31026591 0.80 CCR1 (0.53) KDM4ENPC1MAPTSTAT3RAB9A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-6362339-B1 ELECTROLUMINESCENCE 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY 2002-03-26 US claimed
EP-1218345-B1 METHOD OF MAKING METAL 8-QUINOLINOLATO COMPLEXES 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES CO (US) 2003-04-02 EP disclosed
EP-1218345-A1 METHOD OF MAKING METAL 8-QUINOLINOLATO COMPLEXES 3M Innovative Properties Company (US) 2002-07-03 EP disclosed
US-20020040143-A1 Method of making metal 8-quinolinolato complexes 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY 2002-04-04 US disclosed
US-6362339-B1 ELECTROLUMINESCENCE 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY 2002-03-26 US disclosed
WO-2001025211-A1 METHOD OF MAKING METAL 8-QUINOLINOLATO COMPLEXES 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY (US) 2001-04-12 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020040143-A1 Method of making metal 8-quinolinolato complexes COQ8A, SDHA, LDHA KDM4E 2278/4885NPC1 4268/4885MAPT 424/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.