Neostigmine

Neostigmine

SCHEMBL7576189

CN(C)C(=O)Oc1cccc([N+](C)(C)C)c1.COC

nearest known ligand 0.94

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

ACHE

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Neostigmine. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ACHE known ✓ P22303 14/20 0.94
BCHE P06276 7/20 0.94
LMNA P02545 4/20 0.94
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.91
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.91
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.91
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.50
GLA P06280 2/20 0.45
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.45
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.45
NCEH1 Q6PIU2 1/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Neostigmine SCHEMBL29603805 0.97 ACHE (1.00) ACHEBCHELMNAMEN1KMT2A
Neostigmine SCHEMBL8026154 0.97 ACHE (1.00) ACHEBCHELMNAMEN1KMT2A
Neostigmine SCHEMBL34419 0.97 ACHE (1.00) ACHEBCHELMNAMEN1KMT2A
Neostigmine SCHEMBL29618009 0.95 ACHE (1.00) ACHEBCHELMNAMEN1KMT2A
Neostigmine SCHEMBL16228482 0.95 ACHE (0.97) ACHEBCHELMNAMEN1KMT2A
Neostigmine SCHEMBL20425365 0.95 ACHE (0.97) ACHEBCHELMNAMEN1KMT2A
Neostigmine SCHEMBL41128 0.95 ACHE (1.00) ACHEBCHELMNAMEN1KMT2A
Neostigmine SCHEMBL30029632 0.95 ACHE (0.97) ACHEBCHELMNAMEN1KMT2A
Neostigmine SCHEMBL7633009 0.91 ACHE (0.88) ACHEBCHELMNAMEN1KMT2A
Neostigmine SCHEMBL21772308 0.90 ACHE (0.89) ACHEBCHELMNAMEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20020155172-A1 Methods and compounds for decreasing cell toxicity or death YUAN JUNYING (US) 2002-10-24 US claimed
WO-2002080855-A2 METHODS AND COMPOUNDS FOR DECREASING CELL TOXICITY OR DEATH PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE (US) 2002-10-17 WO claimed
US-20020155172-A1 Methods and compounds for decreasing cell toxicity or death YUAN JUNYING (US) 2002-10-24 US disclosed
WO-2002080855-A2 METHODS AND COMPOUNDS FOR DECREASING CELL TOXICITY OR DEATH PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE (US) 2002-10-17 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020155172-A1 Methods and compounds for decreasing cell toxicity or death HTT, GRN, TARDBP ACHE 1718/4885BCHE 722/4885LMNA 331/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.