SCHEMBL7934014

SCHEMBL7934014

COc1ccc(C(F)(F)F)cc1NC(=O)CS

nearest known ligand 0.54

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CYP1A2 P05177 2/20 0.54
CYP2C19 P33261 2/20 0.54
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.54
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.53
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.53
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.53
HTT P42858 3/20 0.53
KCNT1 Q5JUK3 1/20 0.53
KCNT2 Q6UVM3 1/20 0.53
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.52
PPARA Q07869 1/20 0.52
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.50
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.50
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.49
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.49
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.49
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.48
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.48
RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.48
POLB P06746 1/20 0.48

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7934047 0.87 HTT (0.67) CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL10676913 0.86 CYP1A2 (0.54) CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL31440788 0.84 KMT2A (0.61) CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL6324453 0.83 CYP1A2 (0.56) CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL20357363 0.82 MAPT (0.58) CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL13170085 0.82 CYP1A2 (0.72) CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL8370046 0.81 MAPT (0.57) CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL1634759 0.81 MAPT (0.56) CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL164777 0.81 MAPT (0.57) CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL5789931 0.80 MAPT (0.74) CYP1A2CYP2C19CYP2C9KMT2AMAPT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20110190285-A1 METHODS OF TREATING A BOTULINUM TOXIN RELATED CONDITION IN A SUBJECT ABSOLUTE SCIENCE, INC. (US) 2011-08-04 US disclosed
US-20110034521-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ZINC MATRIX METALLOPROTEASE DEPENDENT DISEASES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (NIH), U.S. DEPT. OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (DHHS), U.S. GOVERNMENT 2011-02-10 US disclosed
WO-2010033360-A1 METHODS OF TREATING A BOTULINUM TOXIN RELATED CONDITION IN A SUBJECT 1/3 ABSOLUTE SCIENCE, INC. (US) 2010-03-25 WO disclosed
WO-2009045761-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ZINC MATRIX METALLOPROTEASE DEPENDENT DISEASES ABSOLUTE SCIENCE, INC. (US) 2009-04-09 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110034521-A1 COMPOUNDS AND METHODS FOR TREATING ZINC MATRIX METALLOPROTEASE DEPENDENT DISEASES MMP7, MMP3, MMP9 CYP1A2 1547/4885CYP2C19 3127/4885CYP2C9 3518/4885
US-20110190285-A1 METHODS OF TREATING A BOTULINUM TOXIN RELATED CONDITION IN A SUBJECT NPY5R, RAC3, CPA3 CYP1A2 927/4885CYP2C19 950/4885CYP2C9 1788/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.