SCHEMBL8031056

SCHEMBL8031056

COC1=Cc2ccccc2C1

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PTGS2 P35354 3/20 0.53
MAOA P21397 1/20 0.39
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.39
ACHE P22303 1/20 0.38
CYP11B2 P19099 2/20 0.37
CYP11B1 P15538 1/20 0.37
GPR84 Q9NQS5 1/20 0.37
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.36
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.36
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.36
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.36
TRPA1 O75762 4/20 0.35
MTNR1A P48039 1/20 0.35
MTNR1B P49286 1/20 0.35
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.33
DRD4 P21917 1/20 0.33
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.33
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.33
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.33
CA4 P22748 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL8569166 0.81 PTGS2 (0.49) PTGS2MAOBCYP11B2CYP11B1GPR84
SCHEMBL30661162 0.81 PTGS2 (0.49) PTGS2MAOBCYP11B2CYP11B1GPR84
SCHEMBL4304595 0.79 PTGS2 (0.42) PTGS2MAOAMAOBKDM4EALDH1A1
SCHEMBL23234275 0.79 CYP3A4 (0.45) PTGS2KDM4EALDH1A1MAPK1
SCHEMBL6907494 0.78 PTGS2 (0.41) PTGS2MAOAMAOBACHECYP11B2
SCHEMBL19979197 0.78 PTGS2 (0.41) PTGS2MAOAMAOBACHECYP11B2
SCHEMBL8208607 0.78 PTGS2 (0.41) PTGS2MAOAMAOBACHECYP11B2
SCHEMBL7423243 0.78 PTGS2 (0.41) PTGS2MAOAMAOBACHECYP11B2
SCHEMBL7178730 0.77 PTGS2 (0.40) PTGS2MAOAMAOBACHECYP11B2
SCHEMBL4442002 0.75 MAOA (0.45) PTGS2MAOAMAOBGPR84KDM4E

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 11 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-12514105-B2 Fullerene derivative blends, methods of making and uses thereof NANO-C, INC. (US) 2025-12-30 US disclosed
US-20240423084-A1 FULLERENE DERIVATIVE BLENDS, METHODS OF MAKING AND USES THEREOF NANO-C, INC. 2024-12-19 US disclosed
US-12114559-B2 Fullerene derivative blends, methods of making and uses thereof NANO-C, INC. (US) 2024-10-08 US disclosed
US-20230309372-A1 FULLERENE DERIVATIVE BLENDS, METHODS OF MAKING AND USES THEREOF NANO-C, INC. 2023-09-28 US disclosed
US-11706971-B2 Fullerene derivative blends, methods of making and uses thereof NANO-C, INC. (US) 2023-07-18 US disclosed
US-20220293860-A1 FULLERENE DERIVATIVE BLENDS, METHODS OF MAKING AND USES THEREOF NANO-C, INC. 2022-09-15 US disclosed
US-11296278-B2 Fullerene derivative blends, methods of making and uses thereof NANO-C, INC. (US) 2022-04-05 US disclosed
US-6087292-A Metallocene catalysts comprising indenyl ligands substituted with electronegative groups TANGOR GMBH (DE) 2000-07-11 US disclosed
US-5763542-A Process for the preparation of an olefin polymer using specific metallocenes TARGOR GMBH (DE) 1998-06-09 US disclosed
US-5504232-A Process for the preparation of an olefin polymer using specific metallocenes HOECHST AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 1996-04-02 US disclosed
EP-0582195-A1 Process for the preparation of polymers using specific metallocenes HOECHST AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 1994-02-09 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-12514105-B2 Fullerene derivative blends, methods of making and uses thereof FLNB, FLNA, CYP1B1 PTGS2 1804/4885MAOA 489/4885MAOB 309/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.