SCHEMBL874017

SCHEMBL874017

O=c1c2[nH]c(Cl)nc2n(CCCC2CC2)c(=O)n1CCCc1nnc(Cc2ccccc2)o1

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ADORA3 P0DMS8 2/20 0.41
ADORA2A P29274 5/20 0.41
ADORA1 P30542 5/20 0.41
SIRT1 Q96EB6 1/20 0.38
SIRT3 Q9NTG7 1/20 0.38
SIRT5 Q9NXA8 1/20 0.38
ADORA2B P29275 4/20 0.38
CHRM4 P08173 1/20 0.38
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.36
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.36
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.36
PDE5A O76074 1/20 0.36
PDE4A P27815 1/20 0.36
PDE4B Q07343 1/20 0.36
PDE4C Q08493 1/20 0.36
PDE4D Q08499 1/20 0.36

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL837306 0.88 ADORA2A (0.50) ADORA3ADORA2AADORA1SIRT1SIRT3
SCHEMBL875635 0.87 ADORA2A (0.47) ADORA3ADORA2AADORA1SIRT1SIRT3
SCHEMBL1070492 0.84 ADORA2B (0.38) ADORA1ADORA2B
SCHEMBL1067871 0.84 ADORA2B (0.36) ADORA1ADORA2B
SCHEMBL837091 0.75 ADORA2B (0.46) ADORA3ADORA2AADORA1ADORA2BMEN1
SCHEMBL3119543 0.75 ADORA1 (0.47) ADORA3ADORA2AADORA1ADORA2BMEN1
SCHEMBL836483 0.74 ADORA2A (0.49) ADORA3ADORA2AADORA1SIRT1SIRT3
SCHEMBL836269 0.74 SIRT1 (0.50) ADORA3ADORA2AADORA1SIRT1SIRT3
SCHEMBL838257 0.74 ADORA2A (0.49) ADORA3ADORA2AADORA1ADORA2BMEN1
SCHEMBL836075 0.74 ADORA2A (0.49) ADORA3ADORA2AADORA1SIRT1SIRT3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2272848-B1 Xanthine derivatives as selective HM74A agonists GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) 2012-12-26 EP disclosed
US-8143264-B2 Xanthine derivatives as selective HM74A agonists GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) 2012-03-27 US disclosed
US-20110257205-A1 XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AS SELECTIVE HM74A AGONISTS GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC 2011-10-20 US disclosed
US-20110257205-A1 XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AS SELECTIVE HM74A AGONISTS GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC 2011-10-20 US disclosed
EP-2272848-A1 Xanthine derivatives as selective HM74A agonists Glaxosmithkline LLC (US) 2011-01-12 EP disclosed
US-20100179128-A1 XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AS SELECTIVE HM74A AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2010-07-15 US disclosed
US-20100179128-A1 XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AS SELECTIVE HM74A AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2010-07-15 US disclosed
US-20100179128-A1 XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AS SELECTIVE HM74A AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION 2010-07-15 US disclosed
US-20100168122-A1 XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AS SELECTIVE HM74A AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2010-07-01 US disclosed
US-20100168122-A1 XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AS SELECTIVE HM74A AGONISTS SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION (US) 2010-07-01 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100168122-A1 XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AS SELECTIVE HM74A AGONISTS GPR84, XDH, GPR88 ADORA3 57/4885ADORA2A 16/4885ADORA1 29/4885
US-20110257205-A1 XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AS SELECTIVE HM74A AGONISTS GPR84, GPR88, XDH ADORA3 35/4885ADORA2A 11/4885ADORA1 24/4885
US-20100179128-A1 XANTHINE DERIVATIVES AS SELECTIVE HM74A AGONISTS XDH, GPR84, GPR88 ADORA3 61/4885ADORA2A 17/4885ADORA1 32/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.