SCHEMBL911206

SCHEMBL911206

CC1(C(=O)O)[C@@H](C(=O)O)[C@H](C(=O)O)C1(C)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPK1 P28482 3/20 0.44
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.44
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.44
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.44
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.44
THPO P40225 1/20 0.44
STAT6 P42226 1/20 0.44
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.44
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.44
GMNN O75496 1/20 0.44
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.44
MTOR P42345 1/20 0.44
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.44
BLM P54132 1/20 0.44
PMP22 Q01453 1/20 0.44
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.44
APLNR P35414 1/20 0.38
FFAR3 O14843 1/20 0.36
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.33
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL911204 1.00 MAPK1 (0.44) MAPK1TP53SMN1; SMN2NFKB1CYP2C19
SCHEMBL350106 1.00 MAPK1 (0.44) MAPK1TP53SMN1; SMN2NFKB1CYP2C19
SCHEMBL28321506 0.82 MAPK1 (0.33) MAPK1TP53SMN1; SMN2NFKB1CYP2C19
SCHEMBL5455676 0.80 MAPK1 (0.35) MAPK1TP53SMN1; SMN2NFKB1CYP2C19
SCHEMBL28433495 0.75 APLNR (0.38) MAPK1TP53SMN1; SMN2NFKB1CYP2C19
SCHEMBL28427775 0.75 APLNR (0.38) MAPK1TP53SMN1; SMN2NFKB1CYP2C19
SCHEMBL17250003 0.75 MAPK1 (0.35) MAPK1TP53SMN1; SMN2NFKB1CYP2C19
SCHEMBL5246594 0.73 APLNR (0.41) MAPK1TP53SMN1; SMN2CYP2C19APLNR
SCHEMBL3385056 0.73 APLNR (0.41) MAPK1TP53SMN1; SMN2CYP2C19APLNR
SCHEMBL11260869 0.73 APLNR (0.41) MAPK1TP53SMN1; SMN2CYP2C19APLNR

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1813592-B1 CAGE-SHAPED CYCLOBUTANOIC DIANHYDRIDES AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF NISSAN CHEMICAL IND LTD (JP) 2012-10-10 EP disclosed
US-7872148-B2 Cage-shaped cyclobutanoic dianhydrides and process for production thereof NISSAN CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. (JP) 2011-01-18 US disclosed
US-20090012318-A1 Cage-shaped cyclobutanoic dianhydrides and process for production thereof NISSAN CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES, LTD. (JP) 2009-01-08 US disclosed
EP-1813592-A1 CAGE-SHAPED CYCLOBUTANOIC DIANHYDRIDES AND PROCESS FOR PRODUCTION THEREOF Nissan Chemical Industries, Ltd. (JP) 2007-08-01 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090012318-A1 Cage-shaped cyclobutanoic dianhydrides and process for production thereof ADH1C, ADH1A, ADH5 MAPK1 3362/4885TP53 3202/4885SMN1; SMN2 4720/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.