SCHEMBL955059

SCHEMBL955059

CCc1nn(CC)c(CC)c1C(Cc1ccccc1)c1ncc[nH]1

nearest known ligand 0.35

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TAAR1 Q96RJ0 1/20 0.33
F2RL1 P55085 2/20 0.32
PTGDR2 Q9Y5Y4 3/20 0.32
ADRA2A P08913 2/20 0.30
ADRA2B P18089 2/20 0.30
ADRA2C P18825 2/20 0.30
MTOR P42345 1/20 0.30
ADK P55263 1/20 0.30
NISCH Q9Y2I1 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL953387 0.91 USP2 (0.33) TAAR1F2RL1PTGDR2
SCHEMBL955179 0.87 TAAR1 (0.34) TAAR1F2RL1ADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL953663 0.85 MPO (0.34) TAAR1F2RL1ADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL957319 0.75 TAAR1 (0.35) TAAR1F2RL1ADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C
SCHEMBL2104102 0.70 PTGDR2 (0.30) PTGDR2
SCHEMBL12011595 0.68 NISCH (0.49) TAAR1ADRA2AADRA2BADRA2CMTOR
SCHEMBL6934133 0.67 TAAR1 (0.47) TAAR1ADRA2AADRA2BADRA2CMTOR
SCHEMBL14909320 0.67 TAAR1 (0.47) TAAR1ADRA2AADRA2BADRA2CMTOR
SCHEMBL8904389 0.67 TAAR1 (0.47) TAAR1ADRA2AADRA2BADRA2CMTOR
SCHEMBL953334 0.66 CHRM2 (0.43) TAAR1F2RL1ADRA2AADRA2BADRA2C

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7875645-B2 2-(2-cyclopropyl-benzyl)-4,5-dihydro-1H-imidazole; depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, stress-related disorders, psychotic disorders such as schizophrenia, neurological diseases such as Parkinson's disease, neurodegenerative disorders HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE INC. (US) 2011-01-25 US disclosed
EP-1981497-A2 USE OF SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLE OF IMIDAZOLINE DERIVATIVES F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2008-10-22 EP disclosed
US-20070197621-A1 Method for the treatment of CNS disorders with substituted 2-imidazoles or imidazole derivatives F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG, A SWISS COMPANY (CH) 2007-08-23 US disclosed
WO-2007085557-A2 USE OF SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLE OF IMIDAZOLINE DERIVATIVES F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2007-08-02 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070197621-A1 Method for the treatment of CNS disorders with substituted 2-imidazoles or imidazole derivatives GPR119, PER2, MTNR1B TAAR1 117/4885F2RL1 1989/4885PTGDR2 1352/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.