Lithium Ion

Lithium Ion

SCHEMBL9983653

CC(CN1CCN(c2ccc(C(F)(F)F)cc2)CC1)C(=O)[O-].[Li+]

nearest known ligand 0.49

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

GSK3AGSK3BIMPA1

The experimentally established mechanism targets of Lithium Ion. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA2 P00918 5/20 0.49
CA1 P00915 4/20 0.49
CA7 P43166 4/20 0.49
CACNA1G O43497 2/20 0.49
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.49
DRD4 P21917 1/20 0.49
CA9 Q16790 3/20 0.49
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.49
PPARD Q03181 4/20 0.47
PPARA Q07869 3/20 0.47
AKR1C3 P42330 1/20 0.47
ME2 P23368 1/20 0.45
ME1 P48163 1/20 0.45
ME3 Q16798 1/20 0.45
DEGS1 O15121 1/20 0.45
MC4R P32245 1/20 0.43
SLC6A9 P48067 1/20 0.43
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.43
HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.43
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Lithium Ion SCHEMBL9984431 0.88 MAPT (0.50) CA2CA1DRD2DRD4CA9
SCHEMBL9984708 0.87 PPARD (0.52) CA2CA1CA7CACNA1GDRD2
SCHEMBL455662 0.87 PPARD (0.52) CA2CA1CA7CACNA1GDRD2
SCHEMBL454734 0.86 PPARD (0.51) CA2CA1CA7CACNA1GDRD2
SCHEMBL438236 0.84 LDHA (0.53) CA2CA1CA7CACNA1GDRD2
Lithium Ion SCHEMBL9984414 0.83 SMN1; SMN2 (0.56) CA2CA1CA7DRD2DRD4
SCHEMBL381420 0.81 CACNA1G (0.54) CA2CA1CA7CACNA1GDRD2
SCHEMBL9984922 0.79 CACNA1G (0.56) CA2CA1CA7CACNA1GDRD2
SCHEMBL381678 0.79 CACNA1G (0.56) CA2CA1CA7CACNA1GDRD2
SCHEMBL9984170 0.77 CACNA1G (0.49) CA2CA1CA7CACNA1GDRD2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9096524-B2 Anthelmintic agents and their use INTERVET INTERNATIONAL B.V. (NL) 2015-08-04 US disclosed
EP-2408742-B1 ANTHELMINTIC AGENTS AND THEIR USE INTERVET INT BV (NL) 2014-09-03 EP disclosed
US-20110319393-A1 ANTHELMINTIC AGENTS AND THEIR USE INTERVET INTERNATIONAL B.V. (NL) 2011-12-29 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110319393-A1 ANTHELMINTIC AGENTS AND THEIR USE ACHE, ABCB11, MPO CA2 57/4885CA1 315/4885CA7 199/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.