SCHEMBL1060697

SCHEMBL1060697

O=C(O)C=CC(=O)NCC1CCC(CNC(=O)C=CC(=O)O)CC1

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
POLB P06746 1/20 0.50
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.48
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.46
HTT P42858 1/20 0.46
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.46
GAA P10253 1/20 0.46
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.43
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.43
ALDH1A1 P00352 5/20 0.43
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.43
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.43
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.43
TAAR1 Q96RJ0 3/20 0.41
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.38
EPHX1 P07099 1/20 0.38

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1060694 1.00 POLB (0.50) POLBTDP1SMN1; SMN2HTTNPC1
SCHEMBL16054838 0.91 LMNA (0.44) POLBTDP1SMN1; SMN2HTTNPC1
SCHEMBL10065266 0.91 CYP2D6 (0.53) POLBTDP1SMN1; SMN2HTTNPC1
SCHEMBL16054837 0.91 LMNA (0.44) POLBTDP1SMN1; SMN2HTTNPC1
SCHEMBL16054840 0.91 LMNA (0.44) POLBTDP1SMN1; SMN2HTTNPC1
SCHEMBL16054834 0.91 LMNA (0.44) POLBTDP1SMN1; SMN2HTTNPC1
SCHEMBL13078096 0.90 SMN1; SMN2 (0.55) POLBSMN1; SMN2HTTNPC1GAA
SCHEMBL1080641 0.84 POLB (0.38) POLBTDP1SMN1; SMN2HTTNPC1
SCHEMBL1080643 0.84 POLB (0.38) POLBTDP1SMN1; SMN2HTTNPC1
SCHEMBL15462268 0.84 POLB (0.38) POLBTDP1SMN1; SMN2HTTNPC1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120134963-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VIRUS EFFICACY OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CA) 2012-05-31 US claimed
EP-2451795-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VIRUS EFFICACY Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA) 2012-05-16 EP claimed
WO-2011003191-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VIRUS EFFICACY OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CA) 2011-01-13 WO claimed
EP-2451795-B1 COMPOSITIONS AND USES FOR ENHANCING VIRUS PRODUCTION OTTAWA HOSPITAL RES INST (CA) 2016-07-13 EP disclosed
US-9283254-B2 Compositions and methods for enhancing virus efficacy OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CA) 2016-03-15 US disclosed
US-20150202240-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VIRUS EFFICACY OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CA) 2015-07-23 US disclosed
US-8940291-B2 Compositions and methods for enhancing virus efficacy OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CA) 2015-01-27 US disclosed
US-20120134963-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VIRUS EFFICACY OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CA) 2012-05-31 US disclosed
EP-2451795-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VIRUS EFFICACY Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA) 2012-05-16 EP disclosed
WO-2011003191-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VIRUS EFFICACY OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE (CA) 2011-01-13 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120134963-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VIRUS EFFICACY HAVCR2, MAVS, TSG101 POLB 629/4885TDP1 1335/4885SMN1; SMN2 178/4885
US-20150202240-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING VIRUS EFFICACY HAVCR2, MAVS, TSG101 POLB 629/4885TDP1 1335/4885SMN1; SMN2 178/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.