SCHEMBL12040626

SCHEMBL12040626

CCOCCCCCCCc1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.58

Predicted protein targets (top 8)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.58
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.58
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.55
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.55
SIGMAR1 Q99720 7/20 0.50
IDO1 P14902 1/20 0.48
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.47
MAOA P21397 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL28037453 1.00 L3MBTL1 (0.58) L3MBTL1TDP1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2SIGMAR1
SCHEMBL22281733 1.00 L3MBTL1 (0.58) L3MBTL1TDP1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2SIGMAR1
SCHEMBL23014825 1.00 L3MBTL1 (0.58) L3MBTL1TDP1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2SIGMAR1
SCHEMBL14030598 0.98 RAB9A (0.57) L3MBTL1TDP1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2SIGMAR1
SCHEMBL90733 0.92 RAB9A (0.58) L3MBTL1TDP1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2IDO1
SCHEMBL20170449 0.88 RAB9A (0.55) L3MBTL1TDP1RAB9ASMN1; SMN2IDO1
SCHEMBL8048487 0.87 TDP1 (0.61) L3MBTL1TDP1SIGMAR1IDO1MAOA
SCHEMBL7449325 0.87 TDP1 (0.61) L3MBTL1TDP1SIGMAR1IDO1MAOA
SCHEMBL7449055 0.87 TDP1 (0.61) L3MBTL1TDP1SIGMAR1IDO1MAOA
SCHEMBL7448881 0.87 TDP1 (0.61) L3MBTL1TDP1SIGMAR1IDO1MAOA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20170196854-A1 USE OF ANTHELMINTIC AGENTS AGAINST DIROFILARIA IMMITIS INTERVET INC. (US) 2017-07-13 US disclosed
US-9096524-B2 Anthelmintic agents and their use INTERVET INTERNATIONAL B.V. (NL) 2015-08-04 US disclosed
US-20110319393-A1 ANTHELMINTIC AGENTS AND THEIR USE INTERVET INTERNATIONAL B.V. (NL) 2011-12-29 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110319393-A1 ANTHELMINTIC AGENTS AND THEIR USE ACHE, ABCB11, MPO L3MBTL1 4172/4885TDP1 4253/4885RAB9A 2909/4885
US-20170196854-A1 USE OF ANTHELMINTIC AGENTS AGAINST DIROFILARIA IMMITIS MPO, DHODH, DHX35 L3MBTL1 1785/4885TDP1 4027/4885RAB9A 1981/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.