SCHEMBL13038608

SCHEMBL13038608

C#CCCC(=O)N[C@@H]1CSSC[C@H](C(=O)O)NC(=O)[C@@H](Cc2ccccc2)NC(=O)[C@H]2CSSC[C@@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](CC(=O)O)NC1=O)C(=O)N[C@H](CCCNC(=N)N)C(=O)NCC(=O)N[C@H](CC(=O)O)C(=O)N2

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 9)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ MC4R P32245 6/20 0.51
▸ MC5R P33032 6/20 0.51
▸ MC3R P41968 6/20 0.51
▸ MC1R Q01726 6/20 0.51
▸ CTSG P08311 2/20 0.51
▸ TSLP Q969D9 9/20 0.50
▸ ITGB3 P05106 2/20 0.50
▸ ITGA2B P08514 2/20 0.50
▸ PLAU P00749 1/20 0.50

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL13881404 1.00 MC4R (0.51) MC4RMC5RMC3RMC1RCTSG
SCHEMBL12146083 0.92 TSLP (0.56) MC4RMC5RMC3RMC1RCTSG
SCHEMBL13038593 0.84 ITGB3 (0.53) MC4RMC5RMC3RMC1RCTSG
SCHEMBL13881412 0.83 ITGB3 (0.58) MC4RMC5RMC3RMC1RITGB3
SCHEMBL13319649 0.82 CTSG (0.69) CTSGTSLPPLAU
SCHEMBL14274987 0.81 CHRNA10 (0.55) MC4RMC5RMC3RMC1RTSLP
SCHEMBL13351721 0.81 CTSG (0.62) MC4RMC5RMC3RMC1RCTSG
SCHEMBL18767059 0.80 CACNA1B (0.58) TSLP
SCHEMBL13881402 0.79 ITGB3 (0.54) MC4RMC5RMC3RMC1RITGB3
SCHEMBL19605458 0.79 ITGB3 (0.58) MC4RMC5RMC3RMC1RITGB3

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100278932-A1 POLYMER MICELLES CONTAINING SN-38 FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER INTEZYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED (US) 2010-11-04 — — US disclosed
US-20100278932-A1 POLYMER MICELLES CONTAINING SN-38 FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER INTEZYNE TECHNOLOGIES, INCORPORATED (US) 2010-11-04 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100278932-A1 POLYMER MICELLES CONTAINING SN-38 FOR THE TREATMENT OF CANCER MUC1, MSN, SNX9 MC4R 1436/4885MC5R 2419/4885MC3R 1730/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback