SCHEMBL1309936

SCHEMBL1309936

COC(=O)CCCc1ccc(-c2cccc(N)c2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 11)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MME P08473 1/20 0.46
HDAC1 Q13547 3/20 0.45
MGLL Q99685 2/20 0.44
CYP17A1 P05093 1/20 0.43
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.43
CYP19A1 P11511 1/20 0.43
CYP11B1 P15538 1/20 0.43
CYP11B2 P19099 1/20 0.43
HDAC2 Q92769 2/20 0.43
MAOB P27338 2/20 0.43
FFAR1 O14842 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL12087496 0.92 HDAC1 (0.52) MMEHDAC1CYP17A1CYP3A4CYP19A1
SCHEMBL1310411 0.86 EPHX2 (0.45) HDAC1MGLLHDAC2MAOB
SCHEMBL3913014 0.84 MAOA (0.47) HDAC1CYP19A1MAOB
SCHEMBL28011617 0.83 FFAR1 (0.56) MMEHDAC1CYP17A1CYP3A4CYP19A1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7999705 0.83 MAOA (0.49) HDAC1CYP19A1MAOB
SCHEMBL1351101 0.81 TSHR (0.48) CYP19A1MAOB
SCHEMBL3466545 0.81 MMP12 (0.54) MMEMGLLFFAR1
SCHEMBL16035296 0.81 MGLL (0.47) HDAC1MGLLHDAC2FFAR1
SCHEMBL6194181 0.80 HDAC6 (0.50) HDAC1CYP19A1MAOB
SCHEMBL20628670 0.80 HDAC2 (0.65) HDAC1MGLLHDAC2FFAR1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8394829-B2 Bi-functional quinoline analogs GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (US) 2013-03-12 US disclosed
US-8394829-B2 Bi-functional quinoline analogs GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (US) 2013-03-12 US disclosed
US-8394829-B2 Bi-functional quinoline analogs GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (US) 2013-03-12 US disclosed
US-20130012504-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL QUINOLINE ANALOGS GILEAD SCIENCES, INC (US) 2013-01-10 US disclosed
US-20130012504-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL QUINOLINE ANALOGS GILEAD SCIENCES, INC (US) 2013-01-10 US disclosed
WO-2011143105-A1 BIFUNCTIONAL QUINOLINE DERIVATIVES GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (US) 2011-11-17 WO disclosed
US-20110275622-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL QUINOLINE ANALOGS GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (US) 2011-11-10 US disclosed
US-20110275622-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL QUINOLINE ANALOGS GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (US) 2011-11-10 US disclosed
US-20110275622-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL QUINOLINE ANALOGS GILEAD SCIENCES, INC. (US) 2011-11-10 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110275622-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL QUINOLINE ANALOGS BDKRB2, BDKRB1, MRGPRX2 MME 3067/4885HDAC1 851/4885MGLL 3320/4885
US-20130012504-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL QUINOLINE ANALOGS BDKRB2, BDKRB1, HRH2 MME 3325/4885HDAC1 914/4885MGLL 3612/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.