SCHEMBL13408669

SCHEMBL13408669

CC(C)c1ccc2c3cc4c(cc3p(-c3ccccc3)c2c1)c1ccccc1p4-c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.41

Predicted protein targets (top 14)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ KIF11 P52732 1/20 0.41
▸ DHODH Q02127 2/20 0.31
▸ KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.30
▸ RNASEH1 O60930 1/20 0.30
▸ PDE10A Q9Y233 1/20 0.30
▸ MIF P14174 1/20 0.30
▸ TNKS O95271 1/20 0.30
▸ PARP1 P09874 1/20 0.30
▸ TNKS2 Q9H2K2 1/20 0.30
▸ HDAC6 Q9UBN7 1/20 0.30
▸ PARP2 Q9UGN5 1/20 0.30
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.30
▸ EIF4A3 P38919 1/20 0.30
▸ AKR1B1 P15121 1/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1102409 0.90 KIF11 (0.40) KIF11DHODHKDM1ARNASEH1MIF
SCHEMBL753503 0.83 KDM4E (0.30) —
SCHEMBL13408664 0.82 UGT2B7 (0.40) KIF11AKR1B1
SCHEMBL13408668 0.76 KIF11 (0.40) KIF11AKR1B1
SCHEMBL753452 0.73 KEAP1 (0.33) KIF11TNKSPARP1TNKS2PARP2
SCHEMBL12873459 0.72 ACHE (0.34) —
SCHEMBL12841529 0.71 KIF11 (0.35) KIF11LMNA
SCHEMBL18566122 0.70 GPR3 (0.47) KIF11LMNA
SCHEMBL13502052 0.69 KIF11 (0.38) KIF11LMNA
SCHEMBL1102437 0.68 GABRA1 (0.34) LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20100096982-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electrouminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-04-22 — — US disclosed
US-20100096982-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electrouminescent device using the same GRACEL DISPLAY INC. (KR) 2010-04-22 — — US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100096982-A1 Novel organic electroluminescent compounds and organic electrouminescent device using the same OCIAD1, OR10J3, ORMDL3 KIF11 2292/4885DHODH 483/4885KDM1A 2560/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback