SCHEMBL1395126

SCHEMBL1395126

O=C1Nc2ccc3ncsc3c2C1=Cc1cnc[nH]1

nearest known ligand 1.00 ✓ in ChEMBL — recovers established targets

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TLK2 Q86UE8 14/20 1.00
MAP3K11 Q16584 1/20 1.00
NEK7 Q8TDX7 1/20 1.00
NEK6 Q9HC98 1/20 1.00
MELK Q14680 2/20 0.69
CDK5 Q00535 3/20 0.51
MAPT P10636 2/20 0.51
CDK5R1 Q15078 2/20 0.51
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.51
PTK2B Q14289 1/20 0.51
CDK1 P06493 2/20 0.47
RET P07949 2/20 0.47
CDK2 P24941 2/20 0.47
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.47
KDR P35968 2/20 0.47
GSK3A P49840 2/20 0.47
GSK3B P49841 2/20 0.47
CDK7 P50613 2/20 0.47
CDK9 P50750 2/20 0.47
PDPK1 O15530 2/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL29908697 1.00 TLK2 (1.00) TLK2MAP3K11NEK7NEK6MELK
SCHEMBL2230665 1.00 TLK2 (1.00) TLK2MAP3K11NEK7NEK6MELK
SCHEMBL1395124 1.00 TLK2 (1.00) TLK2MAP3K11NEK7NEK6MELK
SCHEMBL16231615 0.82 TLK2 (0.70) TLK2MAP3K11NEK7NEK6MELK
SCHEMBL23252181 0.81 MELK (1.00) TLK2MAP3K11NEK7NEK6MELK
SCHEMBL16234131 0.81 TLK2 (0.69) TLK2MAP3K11NEK7NEK6MELK
SCHEMBL16234132 0.81 MAP3K11 (0.68) TLK2MAP3K11NEK7NEK6MELK
SCHEMBL16234139 0.79 TLK2 (0.65) TLK2MAP3K11NEK7NEK6MELK
SCHEMBL16234143 0.78 TLK2 (0.64) TLK2MAP3K11NEK7NEK6MELK
SCHEMBL9886520 0.78 MAP3K11 (0.64) TLK2MAP3K11NEK7NEK6MELK

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 59 patents — showing the first 20. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20230053473-A1 ENHANCING EXPRESSION OF LINE-1 ENCODED ORF2P FOR CANCER THERAPEUTICS UNIV JOHNS HOPKINS (US) 2023-02-23 US claimed
WO-2021134040-A2 ENHANCING EXPRESSION OF LINE-1 ENCODED ORF2P FOR CANCER THERAPEUTICS THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY (US) 2021-07-01 WO claimed
EP-3282015-B1 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION BIONTECH RNA PHARMACEUTICALS GMBH (DE) 2020-05-20 EP claimed
EP-3282015-A2 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION BioNTech RNA Pharmaceuticals GmbH (DE) 2018-02-14 EP claimed
US-20180000794-A1 COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTION OR TREATMENT OF BRONCHIAL ASTHMA COMPRISING PKR INHIBITOR AS ACTIVE INGREDIENT INDUSTRIAL COOPERATION FOUNDATION CHONBUK NATIONAL UNIVERSITY (KR) 2018-01-04 US claimed
EP-2646557-B1 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION BIONTECH RNA PHARMACEUTICALS GMBH (DE) 2017-08-09 EP claimed
US-20150314018-A1 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION BioNTech SE (DE) 2015-11-05 US claimed
EP-2917350-A1 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION BioNTech AG (DE) 2015-09-16 EP claimed
WO-2014072061-A1 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION BIONTECH AG (DE) 2014-05-15 WO claimed
WO-2014071963-A1 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION BIONTECH AG (DE) 2014-05-15 WO claimed
US-20140030808-A1 Method for Cellular RNA Expression BIONTECH AG (DE) 2014-01-30 US claimed
EP-2646557-A1 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION Biontech AG (DE) 2013-10-09 EP claimed
WO-2012072269-A1 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION BIONTECH AG (DE) 2012-06-07 WO claimed
WO-2012072096-A1 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION BIONTECH AG (DE) 2012-06-07 WO claimed
US-12133720-B2 Methods and compositions for restoring homeostatic capacity of a subject Palo Alto Investors LP (US) 2024-11-05 US disclosed
EP-4368702-A2 METHOD OF ENHANCING RNA EXPRESSION IN A CELL BioNTech SE (DE) 2024-05-15 EP disclosed
EP-3681901-B1 METHOD OF ENHANCING RNA EXPRESSION IN A CELL BioNTech SE (DE) 2024-03-27 EP disclosed
US-20110172206-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY (US) 2011-07-14 US disclosed
WO-2010048273-A2 METHODS AND COMPOUNDS FOR TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISORDERS PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE (US) 2010-04-29 WO disclosed
WO-2010017541-A2 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE THE JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY (US) 2010-02-11 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20180000794-A1 COMPOSITION FOR PREVENTION OR TREATMENT OF BRONCHIAL ASTHMA COMPRISING PKR INHIBITOR AS ACTIVE INGREDIENT PRKCA, PRKCH, PRKCB TLK2 896/4885MAP3K11 109/4885NEK7 751/4885
US-20150314018-A1 METHOD FOR CELLULAR RNA EXPRESSION EIF2AK2, IFNAR1, STAT1 TLK2 3145/4885MAP3K11 3859/4885NEK7 1150/4885
US-20110172206-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE CLN6, PSEN2, CHAT TLK2 3426/4885MAP3K11 3254/4885NEK7 1445/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.