SCHEMBL20161659

SCHEMBL20161659

CCOC(=O)CC1OC[C@@H](O)[C@H](O)[C@H]1O

nearest known ligand 0.38

Predicted protein targets (top 15)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MGAM O43451 1/20 0.38
GAA P10253 1/20 0.38
SI P14410 1/20 0.38
MGAM2 Q2M2H8 1/20 0.38
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.35
TRPA1 O75762 1/20 0.35
MIF P14174 1/20 0.33
FUCA1 P04066 2/20 0.33
GLB1 P16278 1/20 0.33
POLB P06746 2/20 0.32
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.32
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.32
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.32
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.31
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL18214231 0.82 GBA2 (0.48)
SCHEMBL20161707 0.81 NFE2L2 (0.33) ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL13295462 0.79 PRKD3 (0.33) MGAMGAASIMGAM2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL14040403 0.78 USP14 (0.33)
SCHEMBL24894079 0.77 ALDH1A1 (0.30) ALDH1A1LMNAL3MBTL1KMT2A
SCHEMBL20750774 0.76 TLR4 (0.35) ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL1900467 0.76 THRB (0.32) FUCA1LMNA
SCHEMBL16994826 0.76 THRB (0.32) FUCA1LMNA
SCHEMBL1900465 0.76 THRB (0.32) FUCA1LMNA
SCHEMBL3294716 0.76 THRB (0.32) FUCA1LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11045411-B2 Process for treating keratin materials using amide, acid or ester c-glycoside derivatives, and cosmetic composition containing same L'OREAL (FR) 2021-06-29 US disclosed
US-20180133137-A1 PROCESS FOR TREATING KERATIN MATERIALS USING AMIDE, ACID OR ESTER C-GLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVES, AND COSMETIC COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME L'OREAL (FR) 2018-05-17 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20180133137-A1 PROCESS FOR TREATING KERATIN MATERIALS USING AMIDE, ACID OR ESTER C-GLYCOSIDE DERIVATIVES, AND COSMETIC COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME KRT18, CUTA, GLA MGAM 227/4885GAA 271/4885SI 155/4885
US-11045411-B2 Process for treating keratin materials using amide, acid or ester c-glycoside derivatives, and cosmetic composition containing same KRT18, CUTA, GLA MGAM 227/4885GAA 271/4885SI 155/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.