SCHEMBL2303072

SCHEMBL2303072

CN(C)c1ccc(C(=O)Cc2ccccc2Cl)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.52
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.52
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.52
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.49
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.49
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.49
SHBG P04278 1/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 6/20 0.46
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.46
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.45
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.45
FLI1 Q01543 1/20 0.44
EWSR1 Q01844 1/20 0.44
POLB P06746 1/20 0.44
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.44
CTBP2 P56545 1/20 0.43
MITF O75030 1/20 0.43
NR2F2 P24468 1/20 0.43
HTT P42858 1/20 0.43
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9315439 0.84 LMNA (0.70) SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNARAB9AHPGD
SCHEMBL29256169 0.82 NPC1 (0.56) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9ANPC1SHBG
SCHEMBL2085224 0.82 L3MBTL1 (0.62) SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNARAB9ANPC1
SCHEMBL571251 0.81 CTBP2 (0.56) SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNARAB9AHPGD
SCHEMBL17583581 0.79 OPRM1 (0.56) SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNARAB9AHPGD
SCHEMBL8956355 0.79 ALDH1A1 (0.54) SMN1; SMN2KDM4ELMNARAB9AHPGD
SCHEMBL7264886 0.79 RAB9A (0.47) SMN1; SMN2RAB9ANPC1SHBGMAPT
SCHEMBL27917765 0.79 ALDH1A1 (0.51) SMN1; SMN2LMNARAB9AHPGDNPC1
SCHEMBL27917764 0.78 KMT2A (0.56) SMN1; SMN2RAB9ANPC1MAPTKMT2A
SCHEMBL1515783 0.77 KMT2A (0.63) SMN1; SMN2KDM4ERAB9AHPGDNPC1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8524682-B2 Compositions and methods for inhibiting EZH2 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (US) 2013-09-03 US disclosed
US-20110251216-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING EZH2 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (US) 2011-10-13 US disclosed
WO-2011103016-A2 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING EZH2 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (US) 2011-08-25 WO disclosed
US-20100222420-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING EZH2 THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (US) 2010-09-02 US disclosed
US-20090012031-A1 EZH2 Cancer Markers THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN (US) 2009-01-08 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20110251216-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING EZH2 EZH2, BMI1, EZH1 SMN1; SMN2 2963/4885KDM4E 85/4885LMNA 2236/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.