SCHEMBL2441528

SCHEMBL2441528

CC(C)=CCC(CC=C(C)C)C(=O)C(C)(C)C

nearest known ligand 0.46

Predicted protein targets (top 5)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
GRIK1 P39086 1/20 0.46
GRIK2 Q13002 1/20 0.46
FNTA P49354 2/20 0.33
FNTB P49356 2/20 0.33
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2445753 0.80 GRIK1 (0.36) GRIK1GRIK2FNTAFNTBMAPK1
SCHEMBL12088366 0.74 GRIK1 (0.33) GRIK1GRIK2MAPK1
SCHEMBL8990731 0.72 GRIK1 (0.32) GRIK1GRIK2
SCHEMBL13841487 0.72 GRIK1 (0.32) GRIK1GRIK2
SCHEMBL2591191 0.71 GRIK1 (0.44) GRIK1GRIK2FNTAFNTB
SCHEMBL10457048 0.70 CA2 (0.47) GRIK1GRIK2MAPK1
SCHEMBL14482060 0.70 GRIK1 (0.43) GRIK1GRIK2FNTAFNTB
SCHEMBL2592082 0.70 GRIK1 (0.43) GRIK1GRIK2FNTAFNTB
SCHEMBL22441125 0.68 GRIK1 (0.34) GRIK1GRIK2FNTAFNTB
SCHEMBL15389021 0.68 GRIK1 (0.60) GRIK1GRIK2FNTAFNTBMAPK1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 15 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
CN-102300550-A Perfume systems 2011-12-28 CN claimed
EP-2362765-A2 PERFUME SYSTEMS The Procter & Gamble Company (US) 2011-09-07 EP claimed
WO-2010065446-A2 PERFUME SYSTEMS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2010-06-10 WO claimed
US-20100137178-A1 PERFUME SYSTEMS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 2010-06-03 US claimed
EP-2362765-B1 PERFUME SYSTEMS PROCTER & GAMBLE (US) 2020-04-08 EP disclosed
US-8431520-B2 Perfume systems THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2013-04-30 US disclosed
US-8431520-B2 Perfume systems THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2013-04-30 US disclosed
US-8431520-B2 Perfume systems THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2013-04-30 US disclosed
US-20130012422-A1 PERFUME SYSTEMS SMETS JOHAN (BE) 2013-01-10 US disclosed
US-20130012422-A1 PERFUME SYSTEMS SMETS JOHAN (BE) 2013-01-10 US disclosed
US-20130012422-A1 PERFUME SYSTEMS SMETS JOHAN (BE) 2013-01-10 US disclosed
WO-2010065446-A2 PERFUME SYSTEMS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY (US) 2010-06-10 WO disclosed
US-20100137178-A1 PERFUME SYSTEMS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 2010-06-03 US disclosed
US-20100137178-A1 PERFUME SYSTEMS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 2010-06-03 US disclosed
US-20100137178-A1 PERFUME SYSTEMS THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 2010-06-03 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20130012422-A1 PERFUME SYSTEMS TRPA1, PORCN, PLIN5 GRIK1 3842/4885GRIK2 3444/4885FNTA 3984/4885
US-20100137178-A1 PERFUME SYSTEMS TRPA1, PORCN, PLIN5 GRIK1 3842/4885GRIK2 3444/4885FNTA 3984/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.