SCHEMBL2477040

SCHEMBL2477040

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)Nc1ccccc1NC(=O)c1ccc(CN(CCCN2CCOCC2)C(=O)Nc2cc(F)cc(C(F)(F)F)c2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 18)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
UBE2M P61081 6/20 0.48
DCUN1D1 Q96GG9 6/20 0.48
KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.46
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.45
EPHX2 P34913 1/20 0.44
HSD17B10 Q99714 2/20 0.43
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.43
OPRM1 P35372 1/20 0.43
OPRD1 P41143 1/20 0.43
KDM4E B2RXH2 3/20 0.42
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.42
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.42
CD274 Q9NZQ7 1/20 0.42
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.42
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.42
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.42
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.42
CASR P41180 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2476018 0.94 TSHR (0.48) KDM1ATSHRHSD17B10MAPTOPRM1
SCHEMBL12062792 0.91 TSHR (0.45) KDM1ATSHRHSD17B10MAPTOPRM1
SCHEMBL2475705 0.90 KDM1A (0.51) KDM1ATSHRHSD17B10MAPTOPRM1
SCHEMBL2476138 0.88 MCHR1 (0.52) UBE2MDCUN1D1KDM1ATSHRHSD17B10
SCHEMBL2534529 0.88 UBE2M (0.51) UBE2MDCUN1D1TSHREPHX2HSD17B10
SCHEMBL2477829 0.88 HSD17B10 (0.51) KDM1ATSHRHSD17B10MAPTOPRM1
SCHEMBL2475613 0.87 TSHR (0.51) KDM1ATSHRHSD17B10OPRM1OPRD1
SCHEMBL3829268 0.86 ALDH1A1 (0.50) KDM1ATSHRHSD17B10MAPTOPRM1
SCHEMBL3835327 0.86 ALDH1A1 (0.50) KDM1ATSHRHSD17B10MAPTOPRM1
SCHEMBL2479082 0.86 OPRM1 (0.51) TSHRHSD17B10MAPTOPRM1OPRD1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8076332-B2 N- (2-aminophenyl) benzamide derivative having urea structure SANTEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2011-12-13 US disclosed
EP-2107052-B1 NOVEL N-(2-AMINOPHENYL)BENZAMIDE DERIVATIVE HAVING AN UREA STRUCTURE SANTEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD (JP) 2011-10-12 EP disclosed
US-20090306077-A1 NOVEL N- (2-AMINOPHENYL) BENZAMIDE DERIVATIVE HAVING UREA STRUCTURE SANTEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. (JP) 2009-12-10 US disclosed
EP-2107052-A1 NOVEL N-(2-AMINOPHENYL)BENZAMIDE DERIVATIVE HAVING AN UREA STRUCTURE Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (JP) 2009-10-07 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090306077-A1 NOVEL N- (2-AMINOPHENYL) BENZAMIDE DERIVATIVE HAVING UREA STRUCTURE UACA, SLC14A1, ARG2 UBE2M 887/4885DCUN1D1 3664/4885KDM1A 1117/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.