SCHEMBL2903083

SCHEMBL2903083

O=C(C=CN1CCN(CCc2ccc(F)cc2)CC1)c1ccccc1Cl

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTR2A P28223 5/20 0.46
HTR2C P28335 2/20 0.46
HTR7 P34969 2/20 0.46
HTR6 P50406 2/20 0.46
F2R P25116 1/20 0.46
GRM2 Q14416 2/20 0.44
KCNJ1 P48048 1/20 0.43
KCNH2 Q12809 1/20 0.43
ADRA1D P25100 1/20 0.43
ADRA1A P35348 1/20 0.43
ADRA1B P35368 1/20 0.43
PRKAA2 P54646 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL2908554 0.91 KMT2A (0.48) HTR2AKCNH2
SCHEMBL2905103 0.90 F2R (0.57) F2R
SCHEMBL4379112 0.81 P2RX7 (0.53)
SCHEMBL2903101 0.80 SIGMAR1 (0.51) F2R
SCHEMBL2908869 0.79 FAAH (0.51) F2R
SCHEMBL2905713 0.79 ALDH1A1 (0.46) F2R
SCHEMBL2909313 0.79 FAAH (0.52) F2R
SCHEMBL2904068 0.78 LMNA (0.51)
SCHEMBL2906156 0.77 ALDH1A1 (0.52) F2R
SCHEMBL2906184 0.77 ALDH1A1 (0.54)

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120232097-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS PEREZ MICHEL (FR) 2012-09-13 US claimed
EP-2041104-B1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS PF MEDICAMENT (FR) 2010-08-18 EP claimed
US-20090176803-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT (FR) 2009-07-09 US claimed
EP-2041104-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS Pierre Fabre Medicament (FR) 2009-04-01 EP claimed
WO-2007147824-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS PIERRE FABRE MEDICAMENT (FR) 2007-12-27 WO claimed
EP-2041104-B1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR- I ANTAGONISTS PF MEDICAMENT (FR) 2010-08-18 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090176803-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS F2R, F2RL1, F2RL3 HTR2A 602/4885HTR2C 733/4885HTR7 809/4885
US-20120232097-A1 CINNAMOYL-PIPERAZINE DERIVATIVES AND THEIR USE AS PAR-1 ANTAGONISTS F2R, F2RL1, F2RL3 HTR2A 602/4885HTR2C 733/4885HTR7 809/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.