SCHEMBL2955302

SCHEMBL2955302

Nc1ccc(OCC2CC2)nn1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 13)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
BCAT2 O15382 1/20 0.42
MCHR1 Q99705 4/20 0.41
PARP15 Q460N3 1/20 0.38
PARP10 Q53GL7 1/20 0.38
PARP2 Q9UGN5 1/20 0.38
EP300 Q09472 1/20 0.37
FEN1 P39748 2/20 0.35
TRPC6 Q9Y210 1/20 0.35
ALOX5AP P20292 1/20 0.35
CDK1 P06493 2/20 0.34
CDK2 P24941 2/20 0.34
CCNA2 P20248 1/20 0.34
CCNA1 P78396 1/20 0.34

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL29015218 0.84 MCHR1 (0.40) BCAT2MCHR1FEN1
SCHEMBL18291461 0.84 BCAT2 (0.39) BCAT2MCHR1EP300
SCHEMBL410479 0.78 CHRNB2 (0.54)
SCHEMBL30126846 0.74 EP300 (0.46) PARP15PARP10PARP2EP300
SCHEMBL2698965 0.74 EP300 (0.46) PARP15PARP10PARP2EP300
SCHEMBL29417253 0.74 ACACB (0.38) PARP15PARP10PARP2
SCHEMBL16838831 0.74 ACACB (0.38) PARP15PARP10PARP2
SCHEMBL2728360 0.73 MCHR1 (0.50) MCHR1PARP15PARP10PARP2EP300
SCHEMBL15968757 0.73 KMO (0.42) PARP15PARP10PARP2
SCHEMBL2349832 0.72 BCAT2 (0.47) BCAT2MCHR1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
CN-116390917-A MRGX2 antagonists 葛兰素史密斯克莱知识产权发展有限公司 2023-07-04 CN disclosed
WO-2022152852-A1 ANTAGONISTS OF MRGX2 GLAXOSMITHKLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LIMITED (GB) 2022-07-21 WO disclosed
WO-2022073904-A1 MRGX2 ANTAGONISTS GLAXOSMITHKLINE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LIMITED (GB) 2022-04-14 WO disclosed
US-7759349-B2 Control of parasites in animals by the use of imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine derivatives SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION (US) 2010-07-20 US disclosed
EP-1699799-B1 CONTROL OF PARASITES IN ANIMALS BY THE USE OF IMIDAZO [1,2-B]PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES SCHERING PLOUGH LTD (CH) 2007-05-16 EP disclosed
EP-1699799-A1 CONTROL OF PARASITES IN ANIMALS BY THE USE OF IMIDAZO [1,2-B]PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES Schering-Plough Ltd. (CH) 2006-09-13 EP disclosed
US-20050182059-A1 Control of parasites in animals by the use of imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine derivatives SCHERING-PLOUGH ANIMAL HEALTH CORPORATION 2005-08-18 US disclosed
WO-2005066177-A1 CONTROL OF PARASITES IN ANIMALS BY THE USE OF IMIDAZO[1,2-B]PYRIDAZINE DERIVATIVES SCHERING-PLOUGH LTD. (CH) 2005-07-21 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050182059-A1 Control of parasites in animals by the use of imidazo[1,2-b]pyridazine derivatives PLPBP, PIR, PPIP5K2 BCAT2 2343/4885MCHR1 909/4885PARP15 4129/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.