SCHEMBL30163257

SCHEMBL30163257

CC[C@H](C)[C@H](NC(=O)[C@@H](N)CCSC)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(=O)O)C(=O)O

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 7)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ ENPEP Q07075 5/20 0.51
▸ BACE1 P56817 12/20 0.49
▸ FOLH1 Q04609 2/20 0.45
▸ BACE2 Q9Y5Z0 2/20 0.44
▸ CTSD P07339 1/20 0.43
▸ MDM4 O15151 1/20 0.43
▸ MDM2 Q00987 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL30163434 0.92 BACE1 (0.52) ENPEPBACE1FOLH1BACE2MDM4
SCHEMBL29931628 0.91 ENPEP (0.53) ENPEPBACE1
SCHEMBL29931588 0.91 ENPEP (0.53) ENPEPBACE1
SCHEMBL29391346 0.91 CTSD (0.44) ENPEPBACE1FOLH1CTSD
SCHEMBL31432463 0.90 FOLH1 (0.48) ENPEPFOLH1
SCHEMBL29539536 0.90 FOLH1 (0.48) ENPEPFOLH1
SCHEMBL30053260 0.88 FOLH1 (0.42) ENPEPBACE1FOLH1CTSD
SCHEMBL24725397 0.87 BACE1 (0.52) ENPEPBACE1BACE2CTSDMDM4
SCHEMBL30051366 0.87 ENPEP (0.49) ENPEP
SCHEMBL29709563 0.86 FOLH1 (0.44) ENPEPBACE1FOLH1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20240319146-A1 ANALYSIS METHOD FOR PEPTIDE BOUND TO CARRIER FOR LIQUID PHASE PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS PEPTISTAR INC. (JP) 2024-09-26 — — US disclosed
EP-4365184-A1 ANALYSIS METHOD FOR PEPTIDE BOUND TO CARRIER FOR LIQUID PHASE PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS Peptistar Inc. (JP) 2024-05-08 — — EP disclosed
WO-2023277186-A1 ANALYSIS METHOD FOR PEPTIDE BOUND TO CARRIER FOR LIQUID PHASE PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS ペプチスター株式会社 2023-01-05 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20240319146-A1 ANALYSIS METHOD FOR PEPTIDE BOUND TO CARRIER FOR LIQUID PHASE PEPTIDE SYNTHESIS HDGF, VIP, NPPA ENPEP 23/4885BACE1 3899/4885FOLH1 210/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback