SCHEMBL3058074

SCHEMBL3058074

N/C(=N\O)c1ccc(Oc2ccccn2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.48
GFER P55789 1/20 0.48
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.48
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.48
RAB9A P51151 4/20 0.46
GAA P10253 2/20 0.46
F2 P00734 3/20 0.44
F10 P00742 3/20 0.44
PRSS1 P07477 1/20 0.44
PRSS2 P07478 1/20 0.44
PRSS3 P35030 1/20 0.44
ST14 Q9Y5Y6 1/20 0.44
NPC1 O15118 3/20 0.43
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.43
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.43
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.43
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.43
LTA4H P09960 1/20 0.43
PTGS2 P35354 1/20 0.43
PDE10A Q9Y233 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3058077 1.00 LMNA (0.48) LMNAGFERKMT2AL3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL3064502 0.80 KDM4E (0.51) LMNAGFERKMT2AL3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL3064503 0.80 KDM4E (0.51) LMNAGFERKMT2AL3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL11143982 0.79 PTGS2 (0.57) LMNAKMT2ARAB9ANPC1LTA4H
SCHEMBL1151660 0.78 LMNA (0.62) LMNAGFERKMT2AL3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL3064538 0.78 LMNA (0.62) LMNAGFERKMT2AL3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL505405 0.76 IP6K1 (0.60) LTA4HPTGS2IP6K1IP6K3IP6K2
SCHEMBL30362588 0.76 IP6K1 (0.60) LTA4HPTGS2IP6K1IP6K3IP6K2
SCHEMBL3064530 0.75 LMNA (0.58) LMNAGFERKMT2AL3MBTL1RAB9A
SCHEMBL3064531 0.75 LMNA (0.58) LMNAGFERKMT2AL3MBTL1RAB9A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 10 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-9045442-B2 Antibacterial compounds and methods of using same UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC (US) 2015-06-02 US disclosed
US-9045442-B2 Antibacterial compounds and methods of using same UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC (US) 2015-06-02 US disclosed
US-9045442-B2 Antibacterial compounds and methods of using same UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC (US) 2015-06-02 US disclosed
US-20100261673-A1 ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USING SAME UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC (US) 2010-10-14 US disclosed
US-20100261673-A1 ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USING SAME UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC (US) 2010-10-14 US disclosed
US-20100261673-A1 ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USING SAME UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC (US) 2010-10-14 US disclosed
WO-2009082398-A1 ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USING SAME UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC (US) 2009-07-02 WO disclosed
WO-2009082398-A1 ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USING SAME UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC (US) 2009-07-02 WO disclosed
WO-2009041972-A1 ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USING SAME UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC (US) 2009-04-02 WO disclosed
WO-2009041972-A1 ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USING SAME UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC (US) 2009-04-02 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20100261673-A1 ANTIBACTERIAL COMPOUNDS AND METHODS OF USING SAME SPOUT1, MRPL21, NPEPPS LMNA 3491/4885GFER 2056/4885KMT2A 4009/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.