Predicted protein targets (top 16)
| gene | UniProt | supporting neighbours | confidence | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ | LIPG | Q9Y5X9 | 7/20 | 0.43 |
| ▸ | LPL | P06858 | 6/20 | 0.43 |
| ▸ | F11 | P03951 | 3/20 | 0.41 |
| ▸ | F2 | P00734 | 2/20 | 0.41 |
| ▸ | PRSS1 | P07477 | 2/20 | 0.41 |
| ▸ | PRSS2 | P07478 | 2/20 | 0.41 |
| ▸ | PRSS3 | P35030 | 2/20 | 0.41 |
| ▸ | CA1 | P00915 | 3/20 | 0.40 |
| ▸ | CA2 | P00918 | 3/20 | 0.40 |
| ▸ | CA9 | Q16790 | 3/20 | 0.40 |
| ▸ | P4HB | P07237 | 1/20 | 0.40 |
| ▸ | LMNA | P02545 | 1/20 | 0.37 |
| ▸ | ESR2 | Q92731 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | SLC6A2 | P23975 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | SLC6A4 | P31645 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
| ▸ | SLC6A3 | Q01959 | 1/20 | 0.36 |
Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.
Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules
Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.
| Compound | similarity | top predicted | shared targets | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEMBL1787159 | 0.86 | AAK1 (0.39) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL3341978 | 0.82 | CA1 (0.40) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL2559060 | 0.80 | LIPG (0.48) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL1789484 | 0.78 | AAK1 (0.37) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL23027967 | 0.77 | AAK1 (0.41) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL1684669 | 0.74 | LIPG (0.53) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL15633849 | 0.74 | RORC (0.41) | CA1CA2CA9SLC6A2SLC6A4 | |
| SCHEMBL16468001 | 0.74 | CA1 (0.43) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL1787160 | 0.74 | F2 (0.36) | LIPGLPLF11F2PRSS1 | |
| SCHEMBL6135102 | 0.74 | DRD2 (0.39) | LIPGLPLP4HBLMNA |
Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.
Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them
Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.
| Patent | Title | Assignee | Published | Priority | Filing | Country | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| US-20140323487-A1 | Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors | GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC | 2014-10-30 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-8822518-B2 | Compounds as antagonists or inverse agonists of opioid receptors for treatment of addiction | GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) | 2014-09-02 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20140100255-A1 | Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors | GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) | 2014-04-10 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-8633175-B2 | Compounds as antagonists or inverse agonists at opioid receptors | GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC (US) | 2014-01-21 | — | — | US | disclosed |
| US-20100113512-A1 | METHOD OF TREATMENT USING NOVEL ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS | IGNAR DIANE MICHELE | 2010-05-06 | — | — | US | disclosed |
Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?
For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.
| Patent | Title | Text reads most about | Predicted target · text-rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| US-20100113512-A1 | METHOD OF TREATMENT USING NOVEL ANTAGONISTS OR INVERSE AGONISTS AT OPIOID RECEPTORS | OPRL1, OPRD1, OPRK1 | LIPG 3608/4885LPL 1352/4885F11 4448/4885 |
| US-20140323487-A1 | Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors | OPRL1, OPRM1, OPRK1 | LIPG 4624/4885LPL 4096/4885F11 4402/4885 |
| US-20140100255-A1 | Novel Compounds As Antagonists Or Inverse Agonists At Opioid Receptors | OPRL1, OPRM1, OPRK1 | LIPG 4624/4885LPL 4096/4885F11 4402/4885 |
“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.