SCHEMBL3750345

SCHEMBL3750345

COc1ccc(-c2c(O)nc3ccccc3c2C(=O)O)cc1OC

nearest known ligand 0.55

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
DHODH Q02127 2/20 0.54
KDM4E B2RXH2 7/20 0.51
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.51
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.51
HPGD P15428 2/20 0.51
ACACA Q13085 1/20 0.51
GUSB P08236 1/20 0.51
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.49
KMT2A Q03164 4/20 0.49
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.49
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 3/20 0.49
RAB9A P51151 1/20 0.49
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.49
RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.49
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.49
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.49
ABCG2 Q9UNQ0 2/20 0.48
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.47
GAA P10253 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3737883 0.83 LMNA (0.54) DHODHKDM4EALDH1A1NPC1HPGD
SCHEMBL3737884 0.81 NPC1 (0.56) DHODHKDM4EALDH1A1NPC1GUSB
SCHEMBL3743372 0.79 LMNA (0.71) DHODHKDM4EMAPTKMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL21451029 0.76 LMNA (0.57) DHODHKDM4ENPC1KMT2AMEN1
SCHEMBL16895273 0.76 LMNA (0.57) DHODH
SCHEMBL29788461 0.74 DHODH (0.81) DHODHKDM4EALDH1A1NPC1HPGD
SCHEMBL42477 0.74 DHODH (0.81) DHODHKDM4EALDH1A1NPC1HPGD
SCHEMBL7702486 0.74 ALOX15 (0.57) DHODHKDM4EALDH1A1NPC1MAPT
SCHEMBL9848266 0.73 WDR5 (0.58) DHODHKDM4EALDH1A1NPC1HPGD
SCHEMBL28117783 0.73 LMNA (0.54) DHODHKDM4EALDH1A1NPC1HPGD

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-7829567-B2 Imino-indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2010-11-09 US disclosed
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY (TW) 2009-04-30 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090111987-A1 Imino-Indeno[1,2-c] quinoline derivatives, their preparation processes, and pharmaceutical compositions comprising the same IMPA1, IMPDH1, IPO5 DHODH 360/4885KDM4E 1726/4885ALDH1A1 324/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.