SCHEMBL4153368

SCHEMBL4153368

CCC(=O)Oc1c(-c2ccc(O)cc2)oc2cc(O)c(C(=O)CC)c(OC(=O)CC)c2c1=O

nearest known ligand 0.53

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
POLH Q9Y253 3/20 0.51
CYP3A4 P08684 2/20 0.51
CYP2D6 P10635 2/20 0.51
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.51
POLB P06746 1/20 0.51
APEX1 P27695 1/20 0.51
RECQL P46063 1/20 0.51
MCL1 Q07820 1/20 0.51
PTPN1 P18031 1/20 0.47
ABCB1 P08183 2/20 0.47
ABCG2 Q9UNQ0 1/20 0.47
SRC P12931 1/20 0.45
ADORA3 P0DMS8 1/20 0.44
RPS6KA3 P51812 3/20 0.44
TUBB4A P04350 1/20 0.44
TUBB P07437 1/20 0.44
TUBA3C P0DPH7 1/20 0.44
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.44
PKM P14618 1/20 0.44
XDH P47989 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4159685 0.92 ABCB1 (0.50) POLHCYP3A4CYP2D6KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL4160600 0.91 ADORA3 (0.52) POLHCYP3A4CYP2D6KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL4156001 0.85 POLH (0.70) POLHCYP3A4CYP2D6KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL4165750 0.85 POLH (0.47) POLHCYP3A4CYP2D6KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL4157369 0.84 POLH (0.46) POLHCYP3A4CYP2D6KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL4152386 0.84 POLH (0.46) POLHCYP3A4CYP2D6KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL4165827 0.84 POLH (0.46) POLHCYP3A4CYP2D6KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL4168940 0.81 ADORA3 (0.42) POLHCYP3A4CYP2D6KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL4173907 0.81 CYP3A4 (0.54) POLHCYP3A4CYP2D6KDM4EPOLB
SCHEMBL4158975 0.79 ABCB1 (0.48) POLHCYP3A4CYP2D6KDM4EPOLB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20090130051-A1 Flavonoid Compounds and Uses Thereof HOWARD FLOREY INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL PHYSIOLOGY AND MEDICINE (AU) 2009-05-21 US claimed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090130051-A1 Flavonoid Compounds and Uses Thereof CAT, NQO1, GPX4 POLH 3392/4885CYP3A4 518/4885CYP2D6 297/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.