SCHEMBL4408315

SCHEMBL4408315

COc1ccc(CC2NC(=O)C(Cc3ccc(OC(C)=O)cc3)NC2=O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.48

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MMP1 P03956 3/20 0.48
MMP9 P14780 3/20 0.48
MMP3 P08254 1/20 0.48
CYP2D6 P10635 3/20 0.46
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.46
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.46
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.46
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.46
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.46
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.46
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.46
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.46
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.46
SLC2A1 P11166 1/20 0.46
GLA P06280 1/20 0.44
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.44
TACR2 P21452 1/20 0.41
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.41
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.41

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL21973419 0.81 SMN1; SMN2 (0.39) MMP1MMP9MMP3CYP2D6SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL20734813 0.80 ALDH1A1 (0.41) MMP1MMP9MMP3CYP2D6SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL20734875 0.80 ALDH1A1 (0.41) MMP1MMP9MMP3CYP2D6SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL684696 0.77 SAE1 (0.59) SMN1; SMN2LMNAALDH1A1KMT2AKDM4E
SCHEMBL15672146 0.77 LMNA (0.40) LMNAALDH1A1MAPK1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL9402139 0.77 NPSR1 (0.51) MMP1MMP9MMP3SMN1; SMN2LMNA
SCHEMBL1871227 0.77 LMNA (0.67) SMN1; SMN2LMNAALDH1A1MAPK1MEN1
SCHEMBL155983 0.77 LMNA (0.67) SMN1; SMN2LMNAALDH1A1MAPK1MEN1
SCHEMBL10466629 0.75 MMP1 (0.44) MMP1MMP9MMP3GLANPSR1
Cesium SCHEMBL5969740 0.75 LMNA (0.64) SMN1; SMN2LMNAALDH1A1MAPK1MEN1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 2 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8883861-B2 Iminic monomers and polymers thereof RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (US) 2014-11-11 US disclosed
US-20120108677-A1 IMINIC MONOMERS AND POLYMERS THEREOF RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW JERSEY (US) 2012-05-03 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120108677-A1 IMINIC MONOMERS AND POLYMERS THEREOF MIF, IGF2BP1, INMT MMP1 233/4885MMP9 727/4885MMP3 1588/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.