SCHEMBL4409635

SCHEMBL4409635

NS(=O)(=O)CCNc1ccc(/N=N/c2ccccc2)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.49

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAPT P10636 7/20 0.49
MEN1 O00255 6/20 0.49
KMT2A Q03164 6/20 0.49
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.49
CA2 P00918 8/20 0.47
CA12 O43570 7/20 0.47
CA9 Q16790 7/20 0.47
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.46
HTT P42858 2/20 0.46
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.46
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.46
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.42
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.42
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 1/20 0.42
HSP90AA1 P07900 1/20 0.42
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.42
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.42
POLB P06746 1/20 0.42
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.42
CA1 P00915 5/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4409638 1.00 MAPT (0.49) MAPTMEN1KMT2AHPGDCA2
SCHEMBL4410524 0.85 MAPT (0.50) MAPTMEN1KMT2AHPGDCA2
SCHEMBL4410521 0.85 MAPT (0.50) MAPTMEN1KMT2AHPGDCA2
SCHEMBL13596488 0.85 MAPT (0.50) MAPTMEN1KMT2AHPGDCA2
SCHEMBL6698064 0.84 ALDH1A1 (0.52) MAPTCA2CA12CA9ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL4563327 0.84 MAPT (0.49) MAPTMEN1KMT2AHPGDCA2
SCHEMBL4408051 0.82 CA2 (0.55) MAPTMEN1KMT2ACA2CA12
SCHEMBL4408049 0.82 CA2 (0.55) MAPTMEN1KMT2ACA2CA12
SCHEMBL4821832 0.75 RECQL (0.50) MAPTCA2CA12CA9HTT
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL4823442 0.74 RECQL (0.53) MAPTCA2CA12CA9HTT

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
WO-2006060654-A2 PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS DIVERGENCE, INC. (US) 2006-06-08 WO claimed
US-20050203067-A1 Pesticidal compositions and methods DIVERGENCE, INC. 2005-09-15 US claimed
US-20090318563-A1 Nematicidal Compositions and Methods DIVERGENCE, INC. 2009-12-24 US disclosed
US-20090318563-A1 Nematicidal Compositions and Methods DIVERGENCE, INC. 2009-12-24 US disclosed
US-20090318563-A1 Nematicidal Compositions and Methods DIVERGENCE, INC. 2009-12-24 US disclosed
WO-2006060654-A2 PESTICIDAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS DIVERGENCE, INC. (US) 2006-06-08 WO disclosed
US-20050203067-A1 Pesticidal compositions and methods DIVERGENCE, INC. 2005-09-15 US disclosed
US-20040254150-A1 Nematicidal compositions and methods DIVERGENCE, INC. 2004-12-16 US disclosed
WO-2004103070-A2 NEMATICIDAL COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS DIVERGENCE, INC. (US) 2004-12-02 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20040254150-A1 Nematicidal compositions and methods NISCH, PNMT, ATL3 MAPT 2603/4885MEN1 1971/4885KMT2A 2123/4885
US-20050203067-A1 Pesticidal compositions and methods ACHE, DDT, PTMS MAPT 3378/4885MEN1 1567/4885KMT2A 2382/4885
US-20090318563-A1 Nematicidal Compositions and Methods NISCH, PNMT, HNMT MAPT 2690/4885MEN1 2327/4885KMT2A 1937/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.