Tramazoline

Tramazoline

SCHEMBL4760046

O=C(O)C(F)(F)F.c1cc2c(c(NC3=NCCN3)c1)CCCC2

nearest known ligand 0.77

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.63
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.63
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.63
ADRA2A P08913 6/20 0.46
ADRA2B P18089 4/20 0.46
ADRA2C P18825 4/20 0.46
ADRA1A P35348 2/20 0.46
ADRA1D P25100 1/20 0.46
ADRA1B P35368 1/20 0.46
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.44
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.44
HTR7 P34969 1/20 0.43
HTR1D P28221 1/20 0.41
RXRA P19793 3/20 0.41
RXRB P28702 3/20 0.41
RXRG P48443 3/20 0.41
PPARA Q07869 2/20 0.41
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.40
PPARG P37231 1/20 0.39
PPARD Q03181 1/20 0.39

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Tramazoline SCHEMBL121944 0.88 LMNA (0.69) LMNACYP2D6CYP2C19ADRA2AADRA2B
Tramazoline SCHEMBL29362958 0.87 LMNA (0.68) LMNACYP2D6CYP2C19ADRA2AADRA2B
Tramazoline SCHEMBL121943 0.87 LMNA (0.68) LMNACYP2D6CYP2C19ADRA2AADRA2B
Tramazoline SCHEMBL8378445 0.85 LMNA (0.67) LMNACYP2D6CYP2C19ADRA2AADRA2B
Indanazoline SCHEMBL151815 0.85 LMNA (0.66) LMNACYP2D6CYP2C19ADRA2AADRA2B
Indanazoline SCHEMBL3500123 0.84 LMNA (0.65) LMNACYP2D6CYP2C19ADRA2AADRA2B
Indanazoline SCHEMBL1650054 0.84 LMNA (0.65) LMNACYP2D6CYP2C19ADRA2AADRA2B
Indanazoline SCHEMBL11372740 0.81 LMNA (0.66) LMNACYP2D6CYP2C19ADRA2AADRA2B
Indanazoline SCHEMBL3064466 0.71 ADRA1A (0.67) LMNACYP2D6CYP2C19ADRA2AADRA2B
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL17894532 0.71 ALDH1A1 (0.51) LMNAL3MBTL1KDM4ERXRARXRB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1981498-A2 USE OF 2-IMIDAZOLES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS F. Hoffmann-la Roche AG (CH) 2008-10-22 EP claimed
US-20070197569-A1 Method for treating central nervous system disorders with substituted 2-imidazoline derivatives HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. 2007-08-23 US claimed
WO-2007090720-A2 USE OF 2-IMIDAZOLES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2007-08-16 WO claimed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20070197569-A1 Method for treating central nervous system disorders with substituted 2-imidazoline derivatives CRY1, HTR2C, PER2 LMNA 1844/4885CYP2D6 436/4885CYP2C19 77/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.