SCHEMBL4874202

SCHEMBL4874202

CN(C)CC(=O)Nc1ccc2c(c1)S(=O)(=O)c1cc(NC(=O)CN(C)C)ccc1-2

nearest known ligand 0.62

Predicted protein targets (top 19)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAOA P21397 4/20 0.51
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.49
TERT O14746 3/20 0.47
AAK1 Q2M2I8 1/20 0.46
PARP1 P09874 2/20 0.46
NPY5R Q15761 2/20 0.46
TNKS O95271 1/20 0.46
PARP15 Q460N3 1/20 0.46
PARP14 Q460N5 1/20 0.46
PARP10 Q53GL7 1/20 0.46
PARP12 Q9H0J9 1/20 0.46
TNKS2 Q9H2K2 1/20 0.46
PARP2 Q9UGN5 1/20 0.46
PARP4 Q9UKK3 1/20 0.46
PARP3 Q9Y6F1 1/20 0.46
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.46
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.46
TAAR1 Q96RJ0 1/20 0.45
TRPM2 O94759 1/20 0.44

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL4876732 0.81 MAOA (0.57) MAOAMAPTTERTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL4874085 0.80 CASP3 (0.52) MAOAMAPTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL4291524 0.78 TERT (0.73) MAPTTERTALDH1A1
SCHEMBL12201124 0.74 MAPT (0.61) MAPTPARP1NPY5RTNKSPARP15
SCHEMBL8251271 0.72 KMT2A (0.63) MAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1TAAR1
SCHEMBL5775605 0.72 MAPT (0.59) MAPTPARP1NPY5RTNKSPARP15
SCHEMBL764662 0.72 POLB (0.68) MAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1TAAR1
SCHEMBL10916539 0.72 MAPT (0.63) MAOAMAPTPARP1NPY5RTNKS
SCHEMBL12953853 0.71 MAPT (0.62) MAPTPARP1ALDH1A1L3MBTL1TAAR1
SCHEMBL14426565 0.71 NPC1 (0.57) MAPTALDH1A1L3MBTL1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 7 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-0342433-A2 Substituted dibenzothiaphenes AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY (US) 1989-11-23 EP claimed
US-20080070963-A1 Compositions and methods for promoting neural regeneration Neuberger, Timothy 2008-03-20 US disclosed
US-7271187-B2 Compositions and methods for promoting tissue regeneration Neuberger, Tim (US) 2007-09-18 US disclosed
US-20020055530-A1 Compositions and methods for promoting tissue regeneration URI HERZBERG 2002-05-09 US disclosed
WO-2001076592-A1 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR PROMOTING NEURAL REGENERATION ACORDA THERAPEUTICS, INC. (US) 2001-10-18 WO disclosed
US-4965284-A IMMUNOMODULATORS AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY (US) 1990-10-23 US disclosed
EP-0342433-A2 Substituted dibenzothiaphenes AMERICAN CYANAMID COMPANY (US) 1989-11-23 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020055530-A1 Compositions and methods for promoting tissue regeneration TST, DCX, GAP43 MAOA 2786/4885MAPT 1089/4885TERT 495/4885
US-20080070963-A1 Compositions and methods for promoting neural regeneration GAP43, DCX, BDNF MAOA 2786/4885MAPT 685/4885TERT 580/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.