SCHEMBL5083356

SCHEMBL5083356

O=C(NCCO)c1cccc(B(O)O)c1

nearest known ligand 0.51

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.51
POLB P06746 1/20 0.51
HTT P42858 1/20 0.51
HSD17B10 Q99714 1/20 0.51
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.49
LOX P28300 1/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.47
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.47
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.46
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.46
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.46
SPHK2 Q9NRA0 1/20 0.44
SPHK1 Q9NYA1 1/20 0.44
ENPP2 Q13822 1/20 0.43
HDAC3 O15379 1/20 0.43
HDAC4 P56524 1/20 0.43
HDAC1 Q13547 1/20 0.43
HDAC7 Q8WUI4 1/20 0.43
HDAC2 Q92769 1/20 0.43
HDAC10 Q969S8 1/20 0.43

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL1233804 0.86 L3MBTL1 (0.65) HPGDPOLBHSD17B10SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL2555324 0.86 SMN1; SMN2 (0.51) HSD17B10SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1MEN1
SCHEMBL15985305 0.84 KMT2A (0.50) POLBHSD17B10SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL3319225 0.84 SMN1; SMN2 (0.65) HPGDPOLBHTTHSD17B10SMN1; SMN2
SCHEMBL955684 0.83 HPGD (0.56) HPGDSMN1; SMN2LOXALDH1A1L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL2555189 0.83 SMN1; SMN2 (0.53) SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL177577 0.83 SMN1; SMN2 (0.74) POLBHTTSMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL2454819 0.83 HPGD (0.53) HPGDHSD17B10SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1KDM4E
SCHEMBL3031782 0.82 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) POLBHSD17B10SMN1; SMN2ALDH1A1L3MBTL1
SCHEMBL1490822 0.82 ENPP2 (0.45) SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1MEN1KMT2AENPP2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20220340893-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL COMPLEXES AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SUCH COMPLEXES NUEVOLUTION A/S (DK) 2022-10-27 US disclosed
US-11225655-B2 Bi-functional complexes and methods for making and using such complexes NUEVOLUTION A/S (DK) 2022-01-18 US disclosed
EP-3540059-A1 BI-FUNCTIONAL COMPLEXES AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SUCH COMPLEXES Nuevolution A/S (DK) 2019-09-18 EP disclosed
EP-2558577-B1 BI-FUNCTIONAL COMPLEXES AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SUCH COMPLEXES NUEVOLUTION AS (DK) 2018-12-12 EP disclosed
US-20130281324-A1 BI-FUNCTINAL COMPLEXES AND METHODS FOR MAKING AND USING SUCH COMPLEXES NUEVOLUTION A/S (DK) 2013-10-24 US disclosed
US-20080103123-A1 New compounds BIOVITRUM (SE) 2008-05-01 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20080103123-A1 New compounds GPR119, GPR139, GPR180 HPGD 1612/4885POLB 4633/4885HTT 2051/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.