SCHEMBL6200212

SCHEMBL6200212

COc1cc2c(cc1OC)-c1[nH]c3ccccc3c1C2=O

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
CA1 P00915 5/20 0.52
CA2 P00918 5/20 0.52
CA4 P22748 5/20 0.52
CA6 P23280 5/20 0.52
CCNB2 O95067 2/20 0.52
CDK1 P06493 2/20 0.52
CCNB1 P14635 2/20 0.52
GSK3B P49841 2/20 0.52
CDK5 Q00535 2/20 0.52
CDK5R1 Q15078 2/20 0.52
CCNB3 Q8WWL7 2/20 0.52
ABCG2 Q9UNQ0 4/20 0.47
MEN1 O00255 3/20 0.46
KMT2A Q03164 3/20 0.46
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.46
ATM Q13315 2/20 0.46
NPC1 O15118 1/20 0.46
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.45
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.45
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.45

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7226744 0.98 CA1 (0.51) CA1CA2CA4CA6CCNB2
SCHEMBL6203750 0.84 ALDH1A1 (0.50) CCNB2CDK1CCNB1GSK3BCDK5
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7234662 0.83 ABCG2 (0.49) CCNB2CDK1CCNB1GSK3BCDK5
SCHEMBL6203623 0.83 WEE1 (0.47) CA1CA2CA4CA6CCNB2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7227282 0.82 WEE1 (0.46) CA1CA2CA4CA6CCNB2
SCHEMBL6496527 0.80 CTSV (0.51) CTSVCTSL
SCHEMBL6503650 0.77 MAOA (0.54) CCNB2CDK1CCNB1GSK3BCDK5
SCHEMBL30673946 0.77 MAOA (0.54) CCNB2CDK1CCNB1GSK3BCDK5
SCHEMBL30480803 0.77 CA1 (0.56) CA1CA2CA4CA6CCNB2
SCHEMBL29035076 0.77 CA1 (0.56) CA1CA2CA4CA6CCNB2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1266887-B1 Indenoindoline derivatives, their process of preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them SERVIER LAB (FR) 2005-08-17 EP disclosed
EP-1245565-B1 Indenoindolone derivatives, process for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them SERVIER LAB (FR) 2003-09-24 EP disclosed
EP-1266887-A2 Indenoindoline derivatives, their process of preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them Les Laboratoires Servier (FR) 2002-12-18 EP disclosed
US-20020173531-A1 Indenoindolone compounds LES LABORATOIRES SERVIER (FR) 2002-11-21 US disclosed
EP-1245565-A1 Indenoindolone derivatives, process for their preparation and pharmaceutical compositions containing them Les Laboratoires Servier (FR) 2002-10-02 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020173531-A1 Indenoindolone compounds MTNR1A, MTNR1B, CYP11B1 CA1 3040/4885CA2 1941/4885CA4 3192/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.