SCHEMBL6401941

SCHEMBL6401941

Cc1ccc2[nH]c(C(=O)NNC(=O)c3ccc(F)cc3N)cc2c1.O=S(=O)(O)c1ccccc1

nearest known ligand 0.50

Known targets — ChEMBL curated mechanism

BTKCACNA1CCACNA1DCACNA1FCACNA1SCACNA2D1CACNA2D2DRD2GABRA1GABRA2GABRA3GABRA4GABRA5GABRA6GABRB1GABRB2GABRB3GABRDGABREGABRG1GABRG2GABRG3GABRPGABRQHRH1HTR2AP2RY12

The experimentally established mechanism targets of None. The predicted profile below is derived independently by chemical similarity — agreement is a validation signal, a miss is honest.

Predicted protein targets (top 12)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.49
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.49
RXFP1 Q9HBX9 1/20 0.49
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.48
POLB P06746 1/20 0.48
BCAT1 P54687 4/20 0.45
HDAC3 O15379 2/20 0.43
HDAC1 Q13547 2/20 0.43
PIN1 Q13526 1/20 0.42
HDAC2 Q92769 1/20 0.42
PDGFRB P09619 1/20 0.42
PDGFRA P16234 1/20 0.42

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6404747 0.94 NPC1 (0.51) NPC1RAB9ARXFP1TP53POLB
SCHEMBL6399035 0.91 NPC1 (0.56) NPC1RAB9ARXFP1TP53POLB
SCHEMBL6403704 0.90 TP53 (0.49) NPC1RAB9ARXFP1TP53POLB
SCHEMBL6399671 0.89 TP53 (0.53) NPC1RAB9ARXFP1TP53POLB
SCHEMBL6405111 0.89 RAB9A (0.60) NPC1RAB9ARXFP1TP53POLB
SCHEMBL6405775 0.89 BCAT1 (0.49) NPC1RAB9ARXFP1BCAT1HDAC3
SCHEMBL6398213 0.87 BCAT1 (0.50) NPC1RAB9ARXFP1BCAT1
SCHEMBL6405483 0.85 TP53 (0.50) NPC1RAB9ARXFP1TP53POLB
SCHEMBL6400285 0.81 MEN1 (0.55) RXFP1BCAT1
SCHEMBL6400705 0.80 TP53 (0.60) NPC1RAB9ARXFP1TP53POLB

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050054696-A1 Indole compounds and medicinal use thereof JAPAN TOBACCO INC. (JP) 2005-03-10 US claimed
EP-1452526-A1 INDOLE COMPOUND AND MEDICINAL USE THEREOF JAPAN TOBACCO INC. (JP) 2004-09-01 EP claimed
US-20050054696-A1 Indole compounds and medicinal use thereof JAPAN TOBACCO INC. (JP) 2005-03-10 US disclosed
EP-1452526-A1 INDOLE COMPOUND AND MEDICINAL USE THEREOF JAPAN TOBACCO INC. (JP) 2004-09-01 EP disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050054696-A1 Indole compounds and medicinal use thereof IDO1, GPR119, SLC5A1 NPC1 706/4885RAB9A 1891/4885RXFP1 920/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.