SCHEMBL6437619

SCHEMBL6437619

CC(C)(C)OC(=O)CNC(=O)c1ccc2c(N(Cl)C(=N)N)cncc2c1

nearest known ligand 0.42

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
PTPRC P08575 2/20 0.42
F2 P00734 3/20 0.34
DGAT2 Q96PD7 1/20 0.34
GABRA5 P31644 1/20 0.34
MEN1 O00255 1/20 0.33
KMT2A Q03164 1/20 0.33
HPGDS O60760 1/20 0.33
MAPT P10636 3/20 0.32
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.32
STAMBP O95630 1/20 0.32
F10 P00742 1/20 0.32
F7 P08709 1/20 0.32
F3 P13726 1/20 0.32
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.32
LATS1 O95835 1/20 0.32
XDH P47989 1/20 0.32

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL6433843 0.92 DGAT2 (0.41) PTPRCDGAT2KMT2AMAPTF10
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL7447049 0.85 CA1 (0.39) PTPRCF2MAPTKDM4E
SCHEMBL7371013 0.83 AGTR1 (0.32) PTPRCF2MEN1KMT2AF10
SCHEMBL6433230 0.83 ROCK2 (0.41) F2F10
Trifluoroacetic Acid SCHEMBL7372144 0.83 CA1 (0.36) PTPRCF2MAPTKDM4E
SCHEMBL6965041 0.82 F2 (0.35) F2MAPTF10KDM4E
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL6432755 0.81 F2 (0.35) F2MAPTF10KDM4E
SCHEMBL6432917 0.81 TAS1R3 (0.37) F2DGAT2HPGDSXDH
SCHEMBL6434401 0.81 TAS1R3 (0.42) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4E
SCHEMBL7375959 0.80 F2 (0.37) F2MEN1KMT2AF10

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue DACK KEVIN NEIL (GB) 2005-02-03 US disclosed
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue PFIZER INC. 2003-10-23 US disclosed
EP-1077945-B1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER (US) 2003-01-08 EP disclosed
EP-1242120-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I:UPA OR I:MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE Pfizer Limited (GB) 2002-09-25 EP disclosed
WO-2001049309-A2 COMBINATIONS OF GROWTH FACTORS AND I: UPA OR I: MMP FOR THE TREATMENT OF DAMAGED TISSUE PFIZER LIMITED (GB) 2001-07-12 WO disclosed
EP-1077945-A1 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2001-02-28 EP disclosed
US-6093731-A Isoquinolines PFIZER INC. 2000-07-25 US disclosed
WO-2000005214-A2 ISOQUINOLINES AS UROKINASE INHIBITORS PFIZER INC. (US) 2000-02-03 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030199440-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PTPRC 1138/4885F2 350/4885DGAT2 2226/4885
US-20050026836-A1 Composition for the treatment of damaged tissue MMP1, SERPINE1, COL14A1 PTPRC 1138/4885F2 350/4885DGAT2 2226/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.