SCHEMBL6515465

SCHEMBL6515465

N->[Pt](<-N)(Cl)Cl.O=c1ccn(F)c(=O)[nH]1

nearest known ligand 0.44

Predicted protein targets (top 6)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
▸ CRBN Q96SW2 3/20 0.44
▸ DDB1 Q16531 1/20 0.40
▸ L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.34
▸ PKM P14618 1/20 0.33
▸ ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.31
▸ LMNA P02545 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Triphosphate SCHEMBL869856 0.70 ENPP1 (0.51) —
Fluorouracil SCHEMBL6242294 0.69 LMNA (0.59) CRBNDDB1ALDH1A1LMNA
Benzoyl Peroxide SCHEMBL4370687 0.68 F2 (0.52) CRBNDDB1ALDH1A1LMNA
Ribose (Furanose) SCHEMBL2406693 0.66 SLC28A1 (0.63) —
SCHEMBL8377720 0.66 — —
SCHEMBL8790967 0.61 — —
SCHEMBL710129 0.61 — —
SCHEMBL10423652 0.61 — —
SCHEMBL422813 0.61 — —
SCHEMBL5963506 0.61 — —

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 3 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20050255038-A1 Conjugates comprising cancer cell specific ligands, a sugar and diagnostic agents and uses thereof A AND D BIOSCIENCE, INC. (US) 2005-11-17 — — US disclosed
US-20050233949-A1 Conjugates comprising cancer cell specific ligands, a sugar and cancer chemotherapeutic agents/boron neutron capture therapy agents, and uses thereof HOLICK MICHAEL F 2005-10-20 — — US disclosed
WO-2003086312-A2 CONJUGATES COMPRISING CANCER CELL SPECIFIC LIGANDS, A SUGAR AND CANCER CHEMOTHERAPEUTIC AGENTS/BORON NEUTRON CAPTURE THERAPY AGENTS, AND USES THEREOF A & D BIOSCIENCE, INC. (US) 2003-10-23 — — WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20050233949-A1 Conjugates comprising cancer cell specific ligands, a sugar and cancer chemotherapeutic agents/boron neutron capture therapy agents, and uses thereof CD22, HUNK, FUT4 CRBN 1845/4885DDB1 175/4885L3MBTL1 1641/4885
US-20050255038-A1 Conjugates comprising cancer cell specific ligands, a sugar and diagnostic agents and uses thereof CD44, FUT5, FUT6 CRBN 2822/4885DDB1 875/4885L3MBTL1 1639/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.

Send feedback