SCHEMBL6597622

SCHEMBL6597622

Cc1ccnc2c1C(=O)c1nccc(C)c1C2=O

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NOS2 P35228 6/20 0.43
NOS3 P29474 5/20 0.43
CCR1 P32246 1/20 0.39
CCR5 P51681 1/20 0.39
CCR8 P51685 1/20 0.39
TDP2 O95551 3/20 0.38
NSD2 O96028 2/20 0.38
PAX8 Q06710 2/20 0.38
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.38
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.38
ABL1 P00519 1/20 0.38
PLCG1 P19174 1/20 0.38
CES1 P23141 1/20 0.38
RIN1 Q13671 1/20 0.38
THRB P10828 1/20 0.38
BLM P54132 1/20 0.38
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.38
GAA P10253 1/20 0.38
USP8 P40818 1/20 0.36
ALDH1A1 P00352 1/20 0.35

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL7991158 0.91 NOS2 (0.43) NOS2NOS3CCR1CCR5CCR8
SCHEMBL6597630 0.88 CES1 (0.36) NOS2NOS3CCR1CCR5CCR8
SCHEMBL13168838 0.87 NOS2 (0.42) NOS2NOS3CCR1CCR5CCR8
SCHEMBL6407586 0.85 MAPT (0.40) MEN1KMT2ATHRBTDP1USP8
SCHEMBL6410245 0.85 ALDH1A1 (0.35) NOS2NOS3CCR1CCR5CCR8
SCHEMBL6407115 0.85 TDP2 (0.55) TDP2NSD2PAX8MEN1KMT2A
Cleistopholine SCHEMBL6358965 0.84 ALDH1A1 (0.55) TDP2NSD2PAX8MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL6415761 0.82 SMN1; SMN2 (0.39) PAX8MEN1KMT2ATDP1GAA
SCHEMBL6408518 0.81 TDP2 (0.55) TDP2NSD2PAX8MEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL28588064 0.81 ADORA2A (0.54) TDP2NSD2PAX8MEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 8 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-1080090-B1 ANTITUMOUR 1,5-DIAZAANTHRAQUINONES UNIV MADRID COMPLUTENSE (ES) 2004-02-25 EP claimed
US-6525063-B2 3,7-dimethyl-1,5-diazaanthraquinone for example UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID (ES) 2003-02-25 US claimed
US-20020099066-A1 Antitumour 1,5-diazaanthraquinones UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID (ES) 2002-07-25 US claimed
EP-1080090-B1 ANTITUMOUR 1,5-DIAZAANTHRAQUINONES UNIV MADRID COMPLUTENSE (ES) 2004-02-25 EP disclosed
US-6525063-B2 3,7-dimethyl-1,5-diazaanthraquinone for example UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID (ES) 2003-02-25 US disclosed
US-20020099066-A1 Antitumour 1,5-diazaanthraquinones UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID (ES) 2002-07-25 US disclosed
EP-1080090-A1 ANTITUMOUR 1,5-DIAZAANTHRAQUINONES UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID (ES) 2001-03-07 EP disclosed
WO-1999059996-A1 ANTITUMOUR 1,5-DIAZAANTHRAQUINONES UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID (ES) 1999-11-25 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020099066-A1 Antitumour 1,5-diazaanthraquinones PRMT7, TPD52L2, DRD4 NOS2 1547/4885NOS3 1510/4885CCR1 2432/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.