SCHEMBL683772

SCHEMBL683772

O=C(N/N=C/c1cc(Br)cc(Br)c1O)c1ccc(Br)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.79

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MEN1 O00255 8/20 0.79
KMT2A Q03164 8/20 0.79
MAPT P10636 8/20 0.79
KDM4E B2RXH2 7/20 0.79
LMNA P02545 5/20 0.79
HTT P42858 4/20 0.79
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.79
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.79
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.79
PKM P14618 1/20 0.79
SAE1 Q9UBE0 1/20 0.79
UBA2 Q9UBT2 1/20 0.79
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.77
RAB9A P51151 3/20 0.71
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.71
SIRT1 Q96EB6 7/20 0.66
KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.63
PIK3CG P48736 1/20 0.62
PSMD14 O00487 1/20 0.61
POLB P06746 1/20 0.61

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL31575065 1.00 MEN1 (0.79) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL19283322 0.93 MEN1 (0.77) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL15853618 0.93 MEN1 (0.77) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL19283323 0.93 MEN1 (0.77) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL684510 0.91 SIRT1 (0.79) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL10026671 0.91 MEN1 (0.76) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL22179539 0.91 MEN1 (0.73) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL684597 0.90 MAPT (0.77) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL31615212 0.90 MAPT (0.77) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4ELMNA
SCHEMBL22179625 0.89 MEN1 (0.71) MEN1KMT2AMAPTKDM4ELMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 4 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-11858880-B2 Anti-fungals compounds targeting the synthesis of fungal sphingolipids THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK (US) 2024-01-02 US disclosed
US-11858880-B2 Anti-fungals compounds targeting the synthesis of fungal sphingolipids THE RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK (US) 2024-01-02 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, SOD3 MEN1 536/4885KMT2A 1362/4885MAPT 1491/4885
US-11858880-B2 Anti-fungals compounds targeting the synthesis of fungal sphingolipids ERG28, UGCG, DPM1 MEN1 1341/4885KMT2A 3071/4885MAPT 2146/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.