SCHEMBL684794

SCHEMBL684794

Cc1ccc(C(=O)N/N=C/c2cccc(Cl)c2O)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.69

Predicted protein targets (top 16)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
RAB9A P51151 6/20 0.69
HTT P42858 3/20 0.69
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.69
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.69
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.69
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.69
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.66
CD38 P28907 1/20 0.63
NPC1 O15118 6/20 0.60
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 1/20 0.60
SIRT1 Q96EB6 2/20 0.60
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.55
KDM1A O60341 1/20 0.52
MAOA P21397 1/20 0.52
MAOB P27338 1/20 0.52
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.52

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL684231 0.89 RAB9A (0.76) RAB9AHTTKDM4EMEN1LMNA
SCHEMBL6571415 0.89 RAB9A (0.76) RAB9AHTTKDM4EMEN1LMNA
SCHEMBL6571417 0.89 RAB9A (0.76) RAB9AHTTKDM4EMEN1LMNA
SCHEMBL684230 0.88 RAB9A (0.78) RAB9AHTTKDM4EMEN1LMNA
SCHEMBL684189 0.88 NPC1 (0.64) RAB9AHTTKDM4EMEN1LMNA
SCHEMBL680226 0.87 CD38 (0.61) RAB9AHTTKDM4EMEN1LMNA
SCHEMBL684185 0.87 CD38 (0.61) RAB9AHTTKDM4EMEN1LMNA
SCHEMBL10053130 0.86 RAB9A (0.60) RAB9AHTTKDM4EMEN1LMNA
SCHEMBL684636 0.84 MAPT (0.70) RAB9AHTTKDM4EMEN1LMNA
SCHEMBL14949043 0.83 MAPT (0.78) RAB9AHTTKDM4EMEN1LMNA

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-8906829-B2 Synergistic algicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2014-12-09 US disclosed
US-8715745-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES, LLC. (US) 2014-05-06 US disclosed
US-8715745-B2 Fungicidal compositions including hydrazone derivatives and copper DOW AGROSCIENCES, LLC. (US) 2014-05-06 US disclosed
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed
US-20120009274-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed
US-20120009274-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER DOW AGROSCIENCES LLC (US) 2012-01-12 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120010075-A1 SYNERGISTIC FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, SOD3 RAB9A 3846/4885HTT 386/4885KDM4E 1473/4885
US-20120009274-A1 FUNGICIDAL COMPOSITIONS INCLUDING HYDRAZONE DERIVATIVES AND COPPER SOD1, CYP51A1, CYP4Z1 RAB9A 3616/4885HTT 210/4885KDM4E 1286/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.