SCHEMBL7057962

SCHEMBL7057962

CC(=O)Nc1ccc(I)c(F)c1

nearest known ligand 0.52

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HDAC1 Q13547 3/20 0.52
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.48
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.48
HTT P42858 1/20 0.48
MEN1 O00255 5/20 0.47
KMT2A Q03164 5/20 0.47
MAPT P10636 4/20 0.47
KDM4E B2RXH2 2/20 0.47
NPC1 O15118 2/20 0.47
RAB9A P51151 2/20 0.47
GLA P06280 1/20 0.47
TNNI3 P19429 1/20 0.47
TNNT2 P45379 1/20 0.47
TNNC1 P63316 1/20 0.47
RUNX1 Q01196 1/20 0.47
CBFB Q13951 1/20 0.47
POLB P06746 1/20 0.47
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.47
TDP1 Q9NUW8 1/20 0.47
CA12 O43570 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL25914490 0.85 MEN1 (0.50) HDAC1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1HTTMEN1
SCHEMBL17802331 0.83 RAB9A (0.46) SMN1; SMN2HTTMEN1KMT2ANPC1
SCHEMBL30368269 0.82 RAB9A (0.58) HDAC1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1HTTMEN1
SCHEMBL27438068 0.82 SMN1; SMN2 (0.54) SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1HTTMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL863069 0.82 RAB9A (0.58) HDAC1SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1HTTMEN1
SCHEMBL17813317 0.82 SMN1; SMN2 (0.50) SMN1; SMN2HTTMEN1KMT2AMAPT
SCHEMBL8859960 0.81 ALDH1A1 (0.55) HDAC1MEN1KMT2AMAPTNPC1
SCHEMBL8251619 0.79 NPC1 (0.62) HDAC1SMN1; SMN2HTTMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL13110612 0.79 ALDH1A1 (0.57) SMN1; SMN2L3MBTL1HTTMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL30421453 0.79 NPC1 (0.62) HDAC1SMN1; SMN2HTTMEN1KMT2A

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-6624153-B2 Derivatives of two synthetic anti-tuberculosis agents, thioacetazone and p-aminosalicylic acid, have been synthesized. In general, the halogenated compound has the structure of Structure I:for use as anti-tuberculosis UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES IN PHILADELPHIA 2003-09-23 US disclosed
US-20030114531-A1 Halogenated antituberculosis agents KOBARFARD FARZAD (US) 2003-06-19 US disclosed
WO-2002092019-A2 HALOGENATED ANTITUBERCULOSIS AGENTS UNIVERSITY OF THE SCIENCES IN PHILADELPHIA (US) 2002-11-21 WO disclosed
US-20020173548-A1 HALOGENATED ANTITUBERCULOSIS AGENTS SCIENCES IN PHILADELPHIA, UNIVERSITY OF 2002-11-21 US disclosed
US-6482982-B1 BACTERICIDES; MYCOBACTERIUM RESISTANCE UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES OF PHILADELPHIA 2002-11-19 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030114531-A1 Halogenated antituberculosis agents XDH, TST, QSOX1 HDAC1 1117/4885SMN1; SMN2 4853/4885L3MBTL1 1396/4885
US-20020173548-A1 HALOGENATED ANTITUBERCULOSIS AGENTS XDH, TST, QSOX1 HDAC1 1117/4885SMN1; SMN2 4853/4885L3MBTL1 1396/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.