SCHEMBL726395

SCHEMBL726395

CCCCN(C=O)C1CCCCC1

nearest known ligand 0.79

Predicted protein targets (top 10)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ADH1A P07327 12/20 0.79
ADH1C P00326 9/20 0.75
ADH4 P08319 3/20 0.70
ADH1B P00325 2/20 0.41
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.38
THRA P10827 1/20 0.34
THRB P10828 1/20 0.34
SRD5A1 P18405 1/20 0.33
NAAA Q02083 2/20 0.32
ADH7 P40394 1/20 0.31

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9658881 1.00 ADH1A (0.79) ADH1AADH1CADH4ADH1BCYP1A2
SCHEMBL9660884 1.00 ADH1A (0.79) ADH1AADH1CADH4ADH1BCYP1A2
SCHEMBL9462694 0.98 ADH1A (0.78) ADH1AADH1CADH4ADH1BCYP1A2
SCHEMBL1678869 0.90 ADH1A (0.85) ADH1AADH1CADH4SRD5A1
SCHEMBL9660553 0.88 ADH1A (1.00) ADH1AADH1CADH4ADH1BCYP1A2
SCHEMBL9661004 0.88 ADH1A (1.00) ADH1AADH1CADH4ADH1BCYP1A2
SCHEMBL6984253 0.88 ADH1A (1.00) ADH1AADH1CADH4ADH1BCYP1A2
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL8308886 0.86 ADH1A (0.96) ADH1AADH1CADH4ADH1BCYP1A2
SCHEMBL7802361 0.86 ADH1A (1.00) ADH1AADH1CADH4ADH1BSRD5A1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL8303801 0.84 ADH1A (0.96) ADH1AADH1CADH4ADH1BSRD5A1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 84 patents — showing the first 20. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
CN-109641828-B Method for separating formic acid from reaction mixture by extraction OXFA有限公司 2022-03-29 CN claimed
CN-109641827-B Method for the catalytic production of formic acid at low overpressure and for the regeneration of the catalyst used in the process OXFA有限公司 2022-03-29 CN claimed
EP-3484847-B1 METHOD FOR SEPARATING FORMIC ACID FROM A REACTION MIXTURE BY MEANS OF EXTRACTION OXFA GMBH (DE) 2020-10-28 EP claimed
EP-3484846-B1 METHOD FOR CATALYTICALLY PRODUCING FORMIC ACID AND REGENERATING THE CATALYST USED IN THE PROCESS WITH LITTLE OVERPRESSURE OXFA GMBH (DE) 2020-09-23 EP claimed
US-10689320-B2 Method for separating formic acid from a reaction mixture by means of extraction OXFA GMBH (DE) 2020-06-23 US claimed
US-20190291093-A1 Method for Catalytically Producing Formic Acid and Regenerating the Catalyst Used in the Process with Little Overpressure OXFA GMBH (DE) 2019-09-26 US claimed
US-20190248727-A1 Method for Separating Formic Acid from a Reaction Mixture by Means of Extraction OXFA GMBH (DE) 2019-08-15 US claimed
EP-3484846-A1 METHOD FOR CATALYTICALLY PRODUCING FORMIC ACID AND REGENERATING THE CATALYST USED IN THE PROCESS WITH LITTLE OVERPRESSURE OxFA GmbH (DE) 2019-05-22 EP claimed
WO-2018015351-A1 METHOD FOR CATALYTICALLY PRODUCING FORMIC ACID AND REGENERATING THE CATALYST USED IN THE PROCESS WITH LITTLE OVERPRESSURE OXFA GMBH (DE) 2018-01-25 WO claimed
US-8759575-B2 Method for catalytically producing formic acid JBACH GMBH (DE) 2014-06-24 US claimed
US-20030050506-A1 Method for cleaning off-gas flows BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2003-03-13 US claimed
US-20030036664-A1 Waste water treatment in a method for producing formic acid which is free of water BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2003-02-20 US claimed
CN-1396899-A Waste water treatment in method for producing formic acid within is free of water BASF AG (DE) 2003-02-12 CN claimed
US-20030009057-A1 Utilization of an extracting agent as antifoaming agent in the production of anhydrous formic acid BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2003-01-09 US claimed
EP-1254099-A2 PROCESS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ANHYDROUS FORMIC ACID BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2002-11-06 EP claimed
EP-1250306-A2 METHOD FOR CLEANING OFF-GAS FLOWS BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2002-10-23 EP claimed
EP-1250307-A1 UTILIZATION OF AN EXTRACTING AGENT AS ANTIFOAMING AGENT IN THE PRODUCTION OF ANHYDROUS FORMIC ACID BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2002-10-23 EP claimed
WO-2001055071-A1 UTILIZATION OF AN EXTRACTING AGENT AS ANTIFOAMING AGENT IN THE PRODUCTION OF ANHYDROUS FORMIC ACID BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2001-08-02 WO claimed
WO-2001055070-A2 METHOD FOR CLEANING OFF-GAS FLOWS BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2001-08-02 WO claimed
WO-2001055077-A2 FACILITY AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ANHYDROUS FORMIC ACID BASF AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT (DE) 2001-08-02 WO claimed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (3 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20030009057-A1 Utilization of an extracting agent as antifoaming agent in the production of anhydrous formic acid F2, ACSL3, ACSL1 ADH1A 72/4885ADH1C 196/4885ADH4 737/4885
US-20030036664-A1 Waste water treatment in a method for producing formic acid which is free of water MGAM, ESD, SMOX ADH1A 60/4885ADH1C 20/4885ADH4 278/4885
US-20030050506-A1 Method for cleaning off-gas flows AGL, MGLL, CYP2F1 ADH1A 144/4885ADH1C 18/4885ADH4 1527/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.