Propaquizafop

Propaquizafop

SCHEMBL7578027

CC(C)=NOCCOC(=O)[C@@H](C)Oc1ccc(Oc2cnc3cc(Cl)ccc3n2)cc1.COC(=O)c1cc(Oc2ccc(Cl)cc2Cl)ccc1[N+](=O)[O-]

nearest known ligand 0.53

Full drug profile on Sugi Atlas →

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
TDP1 Q9NUW8 3/20 0.53
MAPT P10636 5/20 0.45
ALDH1A1 P00352 3/20 0.45
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.45
HPGD P15428 3/20 0.45
TP53 P04637 2/20 0.45
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.45
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.45
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.45
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.45
NFKB1 P19838 1/20 0.45
HIF1A Q16665 1/20 0.45
GMNN O75496 1/20 0.45
APEX1 P27695 1/20 0.45
PMP22 Q01453 1/20 0.45
NPSR1 Q6W5P4 1/20 0.45
L3MBTL1 Q9Y468 2/20 0.37
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.33
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.33
TTR P02766 1/20 0.33

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
Propaquizafop SCHEMBL7579174 0.88 MEN1 (0.51) TDP1MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHPGD
Quizalofop SCHEMBL7581964 0.87 TDP1 (0.62) TDP1MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHPGD
Propaquizafop SCHEMBL7584000 0.86 TDP1 (0.41) TDP1MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHPGD
Propaquizafop SCHEMBL7583253 0.84 MAPT (0.42) TDP1MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHPGD
Propaquizafop SCHEMBL9136963 0.83 MAPT (0.61) TDP1MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHPGD
Propaquizafop SCHEMBL43925 0.83 MAPT (0.61) TDP1MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHPGD
Propaquizafop SCHEMBL54333 0.83 MAPT (0.61) TDP1MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHPGD
Propaquizafop SCHEMBL2317541 0.81 ALDH1A1 (0.57) TDP1MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHPGD
Propaquizafop SCHEMBL8540160 0.80 MAPT (0.58) TDP1MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHPGD
Propaquizafop SCHEMBL7584108 0.79 TP53 (0.42) TDP1MAPTALDH1A1LMNAHPGD

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 1 patent. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20020004457-A1 Herbicidal composition SYNGENTA PARTICIPATIONS AG (CH) 2002-01-10 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20020004457-A1 Herbicidal composition PPOX, ALAD, DDT TDP1 1969/4885MAPT 1092/4885ALDH1A1 812/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.