SCHEMBL768845

SCHEMBL768845

OC1(c2ncc[nH]2)CCOc2c(Cl)cc(Cl)cc21

nearest known ligand 0.43

Predicted protein targets (top 2)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
MAP3K14 Q99558 3/20 0.32
AKR1B1 P15121 2/20 0.30

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL769127 0.82 ADRA2A (0.35) MAP3K14
SCHEMBL769192 0.80 MAP3K14 (0.45) MAP3K14AKR1B1
SCHEMBL769157 0.71 TSHR (0.40) MAP3K14
SCHEMBL768819 0.70 MAP3K14 (0.40) MAP3K14
SCHEMBL768941 0.70 SIGMAR1 (0.36)
SCHEMBL769399 0.68 ADRA2A (0.38)
SCHEMBL6580397 0.66 AKR1B1 (0.42) MAP3K14AKR1B1
SCHEMBL6605186 0.66 AKR1B1 (0.42) MAP3K14AKR1B1
SCHEMBL6605188 0.66 AKR1B1 (0.42) MAP3K14AKR1B1
SCHEMBL28612213 0.64 PDE7A (0.38) MAP3K14AKR1B1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 9 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20120071506-A1 METHODS FOR TREATING CNS DISORDERS WITH BICYCLO-SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLINE AND 2-IMIDAZOLES GALLEY GUIDO (DE) 2012-03-22 US disclosed
US-20120071506-A1 METHODS FOR TREATING CNS DISORDERS WITH BICYCLO-SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLINE AND 2-IMIDAZOLES GALLEY GUIDO (DE) 2012-03-22 US disclosed
US-20120071506-A1 METHODS FOR TREATING CNS DISORDERS WITH BICYCLO-SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLINE AND 2-IMIDAZOLES GALLEY GUIDO (DE) 2012-03-22 US disclosed
EP-1981499-A1 USE OF 2-IMIDAZOLES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2008-10-22 EP disclosed
US-20070197620-A1 Methods for treating CNS disorders with bicyclo-substituted 2-imidazoline and 2-imidazoles HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. 2007-08-23 US disclosed
US-20070197620-A1 Methods for treating CNS disorders with bicyclo-substituted 2-imidazoline and 2-imidazoles HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. 2007-08-23 US disclosed
US-20070197620-A1 Methods for treating CNS disorders with bicyclo-substituted 2-imidazoline and 2-imidazoles HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE INC. 2007-08-23 US disclosed
WO-2007085558-A1 USE OF 2-IMIDAZOLES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2007-08-02 WO disclosed
WO-2007085558-A1 USE OF 2-IMIDAZOLES FOR THE TREATMENT OF CNS DISORDERS F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG (CH) 2007-08-02 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20120071506-A1 METHODS FOR TREATING CNS DISORDERS WITH BICYCLO-SUBSTITUTED 2-IMIDAZOLINE AND 2-IMIDAZOLES CRY1, PER2, GPR119 MAP3K14 2717/4885AKR1B1 1520/4885
US-20070197620-A1 Methods for treating CNS disorders with bicyclo-substituted 2-imidazoline and 2-imidazoles CRY1, PER2, GPR119 MAP3K14 2855/4885AKR1B1 1491/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.