SCHEMBL7793840

SCHEMBL7793840

O=S1(=O)N(CCCl)c2cccc3c2N1CCC3

nearest known ligand 0.59

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
HTR2A P28223 2/20 0.59
HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.59
DRD2 P14416 1/20 0.59
HTR7 P34969 1/20 0.59
HTR6 P50406 1/20 0.59
ALDH1A1 P00352 2/20 0.47
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.47
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 2/20 0.47
KDM4E B2RXH2 1/20 0.47
GMNN O75496 1/20 0.47
LMNA P02545 1/20 0.47
CYP1A2 P05177 1/20 0.47
CYP3A4 P08684 1/20 0.47
CYP2D6 P10635 1/20 0.47
MAPT P10636 1/20 0.47
CYP2C9 P11712 1/20 0.47
ALOX15 P16050 1/20 0.47
MAPK1 P28482 1/20 0.47
SLC6A4 P31645 1/20 0.47
CYP2C19 P33261 1/20 0.47

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL9726206 0.92 HTR2A (0.62) HTR2AHTR1ADRD2HTR7HTR6
SCHEMBL9726221 0.91 HTR2A (0.64) HTR2AHTR1ADRD2HTR7HTR6
SCHEMBL4850144 0.79 HTR2A (0.47) HTR2AHTR1ADRD2HTR7HTR6
SCHEMBL9726243 0.76 HTR1A (0.64) HTR2AHTR1ADRD2HTR7HTR6
SCHEMBL9726193 0.74 HTR7 (0.73) HTR2AHTR1ADRD2HTR7HTR6
SCHEMBL9726205 0.74 HTR2A (0.70) HTR2AHTR1ADRD2HTR7HTR6
SCHEMBL9726198 0.74 DRD2 (0.70) HTR2AHTR1ADRD2HTR7HTR6
SCHEMBL9726239 0.74 HTR2A (0.57) HTR2AHTR1ADRD2HTR7HTR6
SCHEMBL9283602 0.68 HTR2A (0.39) HTR2AHTR1ADRD2HTR7HTR6
SCHEMBL24327018 0.66 HTR2A (0.43) HTR2AHTR1ADRD2HTR7HTR6

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20010053783-A1 Central nervous system disorders FAIRHURST JOHN (GB) 2001-12-20 US disclosed
EP-0854146-B1 Substituted 4-(6-fluoro-[1H]-indol-3-yl)-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine for the treatment of CNS-disorders LILLY CO ELI (GB) 2000-03-15 EP disclosed
EP-0854146-A1 Substituted 4-(6-fluoro-[1H]-indol-3-yl)-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine for the treatment of CNS-disorders ELI LILLY AND COMPANY LIMITED (GB) 1998-07-22 EP disclosed
US-5130313-A Central nervous system disorders, cardiovascular disorders or gastrointestinal disorders RHONE-POULENC SANTE (FR) 1992-07-14 US disclosed
US-5114949-A Treating disorders associated with 5HT uptake RHONE-POULENC SANTE (FR) 1992-05-19 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20010053783-A1 Central nervous system disorders CNR1, PMP22, CNR2 HTR2A 332/4885HTR1A 42/4885DRD2 162/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.