SCHEMBL9959550

SCHEMBL9959550

O=C(C1CC1)N1CCc2cc(NS(=O)(=O)c3ccc4ccccc4c3)ccc2C1

nearest known ligand 0.50

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
NLRP3 Q96P20 1/20 0.50
OGG1 O15527 1/20 0.49
NR3C1 P04150 1/20 0.48
TMPRSS2 O15393 1/20 0.48
KCNA1 Q09470 2/20 0.48
KCNAB1 Q14722 2/20 0.48
ALDH1A1 P00352 4/20 0.47
LMNA P02545 3/20 0.47
GAA P10253 2/20 0.47
USP2 O75604 1/20 0.47
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.47
TSHR P16473 1/20 0.47
MEN1 O00255 2/20 0.47
KMT2A Q03164 2/20 0.47
SMN1; SMN2 Q16637 3/20 0.47
KEAP1 Q14145 1/20 0.46
HTR6 P50406 3/20 0.46
PKM P14618 2/20 0.46
HTR1A P08908 1/20 0.46
HTR2A P28223 1/20 0.46

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL3153735 0.82 ESR2 (0.53) NLRP3NR3C1TMPRSS2KCNA1KCNAB1
SCHEMBL13757739 0.80 DRD3 (0.60) NLRP3ALDH1A1LMNAMEN1KMT2A
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL3143290 0.79 DRD3 (0.59) NLRP3ALDH1A1LMNAMEN1KMT2A
SCHEMBL10239527 0.79 HTR7 (0.54) NLRP3NR3C1ALDH1A1LMNAMEN1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL9959509 0.78 HTR7 (0.53) NLRP3NR3C1ALDH1A1LMNAMEN1
SCHEMBL22104841 0.78 OGG1 (0.67) OGG1KCNA1KCNAB1LMNAKMT2A
SCHEMBL9959434 0.74 NLRP3 (0.51) NLRP3NR3C1KCNA1KCNAB1ALDH1A1
SCHEMBL25591221 0.73 HDAC6 (0.53) ALDH1A1LMNAGAAUSP2HPGD
SCHEMBL30470981 0.73 HDAC6 (0.53) ALDH1A1LMNAGAAUSP2HPGD
SCHEMBL9959631 0.73 HTR6 (0.63) NLRP3LMNAMEN1KMT2ASMN1; SMN2

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 5 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
EP-2007729-B1 SUBSTITUTED TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE COMPOUNDS, THEIR PREPARATION AND USE IN MEDICAMENTS ESTEVE LABOR DR (ES) 2012-06-27 EP claimed
EP-2007729-B1 SUBSTITUTED TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE COMPOUNDS, THEIR PREPARATION AND USE IN MEDICAMENTS ESTEVE LABOR DR (ES) 2012-06-27 EP disclosed
US-20090209528-A1 SUBSTITUTED TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE COMPOUND, THEIR PREPARATION AND USE IN MEDICAMENTS LABORATORIOS DEL DR. ESTEVE S.A. (ES) 2009-08-20 US disclosed
US-20090209528-A1 SUBSTITUTED TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE COMPOUND, THEIR PREPARATION AND USE IN MEDICAMENTS LABORATORIOS DEL DR. ESTEVE S.A. (ES) 2009-08-20 US disclosed
WO-2007107373-A1 SUBSTITUTED TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE COMPOUNDS, THEIR PREPARATION AND USE IN MEDICAMENTS LABORATORIOS DEL DR. ESTEVE S.A. (DE) 2007-09-27 WO disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (1 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20090209528-A1 SUBSTITUTED TETRAHYDROISOQUINOLINE COMPOUND, THEIR PREPARATION AND USE IN MEDICAMENTS HTR6, HTR5A, HTR7 NLRP3 757/4885OGG1 3227/4885NR3C1 741/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.