SCHEMBL16425762

SCHEMBL16425762

CC(F)c1ccc(Cl)cc1

nearest known ligand 0.56

Predicted protein targets (top 20)

geneUniProtsupporting neighboursconfidence
ADRB2 P07550 1/20 0.56
TSHR P16473 2/20 0.46
MAPK1 P28482 2/20 0.46
HIF1A Q16665 2/20 0.46
TDP1 Q9NUW8 2/20 0.46
LMNA P02545 2/20 0.44
CYP2A6 P11509 1/20 0.44
TP53 P04637 1/20 0.44
HPGD P15428 1/20 0.44
BRD4 O60885 1/20 0.41
CYP19A1 P11511 3/20 0.41
IDO1 P14902 2/20 0.41
TDO2 P48775 2/20 0.41
FFAR2 O15552 1/20 0.41
SLC6A2 P23975 3/20 0.39
SLC6A3 Q01959 2/20 0.39
CA1 P00915 1/20 0.38
CA2 P00918 1/20 0.38
AOC3 Q16853 1/20 0.38
SLC6A4 P31645 2/20 0.37

Click a target to see other patent compounds predicted against it — the reverse direction, in place.

Similar compounds — the chemically nearest patent molecules

Nearest neighbours by Morgan-fingerprint cosine across the patent-compound collection, with each neighbour's top predicted target and the predicted targets it shares with this molecule.

Compoundsimilaritytop predictedshared targets
SCHEMBL5149720 0.85 ESR1 (0.38) ADRB2LMNA
SCHEMBL10039362 0.82 TYR (0.46) ADRB2MAPK1HIF1ALMNATP53
Fluoride SCHEMBL27389991 0.80 TYR (0.44) ADRB2MAPK1HIF1ALMNATP53
SCHEMBL197810 0.79 ADRB2 (0.65) ADRB2TSHRMAPK1HIF1ATDP1
SCHEMBL2044239 0.78 TSHR (0.46) ADRB2TSHRMAPK1TDP1
SCHEMBL4445207 0.77 ADRB2 (0.62) ADRB2TSHRMAPK1HIF1ATDP1
SCHEMBL153358 0.77 ADRB2 (0.62) ADRB2TSHRMAPK1HIF1ATDP1
SCHEMBL9470689 0.77 LMNA (0.50) ADRB2TSHRMAPK1HIF1ATDP1
SCHEMBL30720007 0.77 ADRB2 (0.62) ADRB2TSHRMAPK1HIF1ATDP1
Hydrochloric Acid SCHEMBL28767407 0.77 ADRB2 (0.62) ADRB2TSHRMAPK1HIF1ATDP1

Similarity is cosine over the 2,048-bit Morgan fingerprint (≈ Tanimoto). Identical fingerprints score 1.00.

Patent provenance — the patents this molecule appears in, and who filed them

Claimed or disclosed in 6 patents. claimed = in the patent's claims; disclosed = body only.

PatentTitleAssigneePublishedPriorityFilingCountryStatus
US-20160264512-A1 C-HALOGEN BOND FORMATION THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY (US) 2016-09-15 US disclosed
US-20160264512-A1 C-HALOGEN BOND FORMATION THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY (US) 2016-09-15 US disclosed
WO-2015134467-A1 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR DIRECT RADIOACTIVE LABELING OF BIO-ACTIVE MOLECULES AND BUILDING BLOCKS THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY (US) 2015-09-11 WO disclosed
WO-2015054476-A1 C-HALOGEN BOND FORMATION THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY (US) 2015-04-16 WO disclosed
US-20150031768-A1 C-HALOGEN BOND FORMATION NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 2015-01-29 US disclosed
US-20150031768-A1 C-HALOGEN BOND FORMATION NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 2015-01-29 US disclosed

Patent text — is the patent's own abstract consistent with the prediction?

For each of this compound's patents that has machine-readable text (2 of them — usually the abstract, not the full specification), we ask MedCPT which protein the text reads most about, and where the chemistry-predicted target lands among 4885 human targets. A high rank means the patent's own wording is consistent with the prediction — a weak, independent signal, not proof of activity.

PatentTitleText reads most aboutPredicted target · text-rank
US-20160264512-A1 C-HALOGEN BOND FORMATION FOS, BCL3, CBR3 ADRB2 4767/4885TSHR 2428/4885MAPK1 3818/4885
US-20150031768-A1 C-HALOGEN BOND FORMATION CBR3, FOS, CBR1 ADRB2 4331/4885TSHR 2117/4885MAPK1 3548/4885

“Text reads most about” is the patent abstract's nearest protein in MedCPT space (background-debiased). Only ~1.4% of patents have machine-readable text, so most compounds won't have this panel.